It's all still sourced so I'm not sure what the issue is.

You don't know how citing sources works, do you? If we went your route, she'd have to say, "According to police..." before every sentence in the article. She made the claims and backed them up with a clear and easy-to-navigate source, which was right after the claims. The way the article is set up is concise and the…

They don't? How do you know for sure?

But I just explained to you why mental illness is likely not as involved as you think it is.

The claim was that his mental illness made him commit this violent act. Asperger's is his only diagnosed disorder, so clearly if you claimed that the diagnosed illness he had caused him to be violent, you must mean the Asperger's because it's his only diagnosed disorder. Maybe that wasn't what you meant to say, but it…

And where does it say that people with Asperger's are predisposed to violence? That's the claim you're really making, so back it up.

Obligatory: Not all wizards!

I'm confused about what part of this is disappointing you. Was it that they mentioned who this piece of scum's father is? That doesn't make him a celebrity and no one here is impressed by what he did or thinks he should be revered, so I'm not sure where your outrage is coming from.

And 58% of statistics are made up on the spot!

I'm happy he did it, too. What would the high school have done? They can't give him detention - he graduated.

But the vast majority of the people here obviously disagree with that comment, so why would you assume that everyone on this website is a hypocrite as we sit here and push back against what is clearly one person's opinion. Is it really logical to read one comment that has enormous push-back and assume it's a popular…

Right, that's why there's now several commentors shutting the one claiming homophobia down. Oh, but that doesn't really fit with your image of us as misandrist harpies does it?

Don't try to gaslight me. I'm happy to debate this stuff with you, but don't try to make this out like I just have my feelings hurt and have nothing logical to say.

But the father's reaction clearly points to the fact that it wasn't just harmless fun.

I see your point, but if they have the right to be creepy, we have the right to call them out for it. It may not be a legal consequence, but you can definitely create a social situation that becomes uncomfortable for the "creep" in order to discourage the behavior.

I read it and we do agree, but I think it's problematic to assume that viewing someone sexually is inherently creepy. There are ways to be sexual without exploitation. And if a person's sexual gratification depends on the flagrant disregard for another person's privacy, they're the one with the problem.

That's understandable. Maybe I'm being silly, but what kind of damage can a drone cause? I mean I guess it could fly into someone's eye or something. Seems like it'd have to be pretty lightweight to operate effectively, though. Maybe someone's fingers getting caught?

In general, we can expect more of men. That was the point I was trying to make. Plenty of men aren't creepy and if they can manage to treat us like human beings, anyone can. It may be reality that some of them don't, but I won't stop holding them to a higher standard because it's possible for them to control…

I'm not really sure what you're insinuating with these comments. With the first you seem to imply that this woman is lying, but then in the third you make excuses for "dirty old men" who definitely do this sort of thing - so you seem to be aware that it happens. And then the second one -the guy in question here…

So the most important thing is safety? Of what/who? I genuinely don't understand what you mean. Is it the safety of the drone you're referring to or the safety of the operator or of the person being filmed?