I'd venture a guess that lots of men have bisexual urges as well, although guy on guy isn't as widely (for lack of a better word) accepted as lady on lady. I identify as bisexual, meaning, for those who don't understand, that I'm sexually attracted to my gender and other genders, not necessarily within the gender…

I never defended the phrase, I just meant to clarify its meaning in the drag community. Notice I didn't say I approved of it anywhere or that I thought it was appropriate.

I get where you're coming from. I never defended the phrase. I just meant to clarify its meaning in the drag community.

First of all, I'm not sure why you're being so rude. We can have a debate about this stuff and still be civil with one another. Adults can have a discussion without being condescending. Grow up.

Before you jump down people's throats, take a look at the show you're watching. They sometimes do little "drag vocabulary" shorts on the show, and "fishy" means "to make a convincing woman." That's how the shows uses it. I'm not saying that's the only way it's ever been used, but on the show, that's the definition.

He was brilliant in that role. I remember watching a video of him snuggling with some puppies and being thoroughly confused that he wasn't even a little mean. Takes a lot of talent to be so convincingly awful.

I didn't fault him personally. I merely mentioned that it's a disgrace tha tit took this long.

I never said I expected it, just that it's reprehensible that they haven't done anything.

This has never been a one-person job, though. The entire institution should have been working on this for decades. They haven't No more excuses.

It was never going to be a one-person job. This should have been taken care of literally decades ago. The church as an institution has no reason other than wanting to cover up the truth for waiting so long.

This has been going on for decades. They've had plenty of time to investigate this and they decided to cover it up instead. It's not unreasonable to want change right this minute. They've had so much time that most of the child victims are now middle aged. No more excuses.

So you're comparing the person who's typing this to a fantasy character. Yup. I'm done.

Here's an idea: How about we stop dictating whether or not someone's sexuality is real and allow them to experience sexuality for themselves? Who gives a flying fuck if they're straight today and bi tomorrow, or gay today and bi tomorrow? Let people identify their own sexualities and respect them as people. We…

Oh, look! We got one already!

The ones who have filed reports saying they did not consent to having their pictures taken? Yes, I have.

If you have to ask that question, I'm afraid I can't help you. It's not my job to educate you about why posting a sexualized image of someone without their permission is slightly different than posting a picture of someone eating cheese without their permission. Did you talk to this man, by the way? Did he tell you…

Because if you're afraid that someone's going to snap pictures of your body without your consent, it makes it a threat to even go outside.

Because someone's bodily integrity and identity doesn't end with their face.

That last one is my favorite. She's just sitting there, having a snack, rockin' out. Livin' the dream.

I am, too. I'm not trying to be an asshole, but I don't understand how songs like this don't make you want to vomit up everything you've ever eaten.