To be fair, the car doesn’t have enough power to throttle steer 285's in the back... so “no control over the rear end” could be legit.

Ah! Interesting observation and I think you might be on to something!

Counterpoint though: I drive a red car and it’s super fast. :)

Note that in Kristen’s list of the tested options, option 2 and option 5 are the exact same thing.

WTF? This was confusing as hell. I think you’ve got some numbers wrong and stuff. Maybe give it a once-over and try it again?

Yes.  And while they’re in use, there’s the “ottoman”.

Ottoman?

Might as well say the same thing everyone else is saying.

You know that EVERY car has rear reflectors right? And I’m pretty sure they also need to be exposed with the trunk open.

Agree 100%. I might not want a turbo, but it’s absolutely appropriate here.

LOL. I know, right??
To agree with the OP, even though he’s wrong about Porsche for the moment, I DID have the F-Type on my short list when I wanted a sports car and didn’t even bother to test drive one because there was no manual available at the time. They brought one out later, but only on the V6 or something? And…

My opinion: If you can see the muffler of the car in front of you, then that car is either broken or poorly designed.
Best example: Chrysler Sebring / Dodge Avenger.
Disagree? Fight me!!!

There’s only one feature I’m looking forward to. Google Maps on CarPlay. That’s it.

I don’t blame you the tiniest bit. I’m with you 100%. I just didn’t think anyone was even remotely expecting the possibility.

When they designed the BRZ/FRS/86, they designed a platform that would work ideally with the low center of gravity provided by the boxer engine.

WTF? I just bought a trackday Porsche with a manual.

Were you thinking there might be?

Wait... is this not a Volvo?

Soooo... this isn’t computer memory??

Is he proud of that victory? I mean... it lets him check off the box but it’s hardly an accomplishment.

OMG!! How timely!!