This made me laugh. Not because this is cool or funny, but because you really missed the point and just ran and ran with it for the full nine yards. Bravo!

Marry me. I'm a beantown native who lives DD and is married to a coffee snob.

Thanks for the explanation. She (or one of her ridiculous parents, if they were actual "managers" or even halfway decent parents) could have taken a few preventative steps or at least limited the damage, it seems.

I came back one more time to say that I posted the original comment in jest...not sure how I came off. Anyway, another one I love to butcher is "dove-it" for duvet, with a little bit of a southern drawl for my guy.

Erm, no. The parody lady was closer to it than all those advertisements to see Les Miersahb, rhyming it with Saab. There's a little "bleh" at the end.

Lol. Me, too.

At least she didn't say "lay miserAHB". Now time for me to visit the Louv and have some chev...after I buy something from Sur Le TAB.

ShillCard, yes! He be straight shillin'

Her mother said the kid freaked out. Also, kiddo is three. The same age that kids have predilections to eat dirt and worms.

Kiddo is a toddler- big difference. Also, the mom said nothing about the three year old hating her unibrow or even being aware of it as a bad thing. Her daughter freaked out over the wax, not the fact that she has big eyebrows. This was mom's doing.

Because she has darker features than say, Gweneth Paltrow.

It looks like fried ass. Jennifer is beautiful, but yeah, my first thought was how overblown her hair looked. The other responder needs to calm down.

Ugh, that face, the one hand digging into her naked ass and the other deep in his pocket...it is creepee. Someone should be fired over both the concept and execution.

Lol. I feel this little comment is under-appreciated. Everyone else is all "OMG, that sounds ahh-mazing!"

I'm not sure about in this instance, but "plain" the way I've heard it/interpreted it often refers to someone who's neither ugly nor beautiful. Their features aren't disagreeable per say, but the features don't stand out. Nothing distinctive that makes the person memorable.

Don't forgot Philadelphia. I remember Leno joking that when men knick themselves while shaving, they bleed cheese whiz.

That inanimate object you speak is a weapon designed to kill. This is not like trying to kill someone with a toothbrush, which is also an intimate object. Or the knitting needles that the TSA claims could be used to hijack a plane. A gun has a singular purpose and that is to kill.

It's too bad that with that one word, she said you "failed" and apparently could not take anything useful from your thoughtful post. Yeah, so "women" is preferable to "females", especially if you refer to men as such. But that doesn't mean that your greater points are invalid. Sheesh.

I think you took this very personally, perhaps given your profession. She was simply relating her story, and whether or not someone intervened is a logical detail to include. That's it.

The question was taken in context with all the other rhetorical questions to make a larger point.