I’m just gonna go on disagreeing with the whole “if you can’t afford the repair, you can’t afford the car” premise. It’s one of those things that sounds cute but is just wrong.

But Corollas cost money to repair. Money that many people don’t have. So if somebody drives a ‘98 Civic but can’t afford to replace the timing belt...what would you have them trade down to?

Huh? What is this mythical “less desirable” car that never requires any repairs?

I LUV Southwest for exactly the reasons you cite.

The concept of spin has been replaced with a policy of scorched earth and flailing arms.

“Nuh uh! The LIE-berals stopped calling it ‘global warming’ and started calling it “climate change” when Soros quit melting the icebergs! Or something...”

Whenever I read Gizmodo comments without fail you will see people who admit to never using the site but somehow also having a distaste for it.

It seems you don’t know what the word “bigoted” means.

Let’s get this straight: 50% of the country did not cast votes for Trump.

I agree. Weird thing: I tried to star YOUR comment and the score actually went down. Thought I was losing my mind, so I tried again. Score went down again. So, um...sorry your comment is tanking, my* bad, apparently.

“Opportunistic” is more like it.

LOLOLOLOLOLOOOOL @ the Trump supporter getting indignant at the thought of unsubstantiated claims.

The code for the Anker string lights has expired. :-(

The code for the Anker string lights has expired. :-(

“flipping over the cassette”

The answer you’re looking for is “Jesus.”

Oh come the FUCK on.

I tend to agree with you in some cases; but I would argue that oil (and by extension, the car companies—or the product they sell, anyway) is wrapped up in our economy and national security in ways that many other industries are not. We can argue about whether it’s wise to have the government intervene and protect Ford…

I think it was WaPo’s site where someone made the same point — that fact checkers have consistently rated Clinton as far more honest. Someone replied and basically said this argument was invalid because fact checkers are biased. “They side with Clinton 3 out of every 4 times!!” Because that’s clearly a sign of bias…

Interesting—did they give a reason for blocking the extension, or do you just work for one of those places that blocks everything but IE 7?