The best trick I learned as a freshman in college with this type of vending machine was that if you tilt it forward (do not attempt alone) enough so that all the racks slide forward onto the glass, then put in money and select an item, the entire row will clear. I suspect this is for the same reason as you mentioned…

Ah, that was such an awesome trick. As Unmiurph mentioned they quickly caught on to that issue, though.

What is the point with contesting climate change? *Even* if the climate were not changing, there is absolutely no disputing that we're severely hurting the environment in other ways that would certainly be improved were more anti-climate change measures to be implemented.

The problem is that a great deal of their efforts are directed at US citizens, so it's kind of scary that the building is even that big. It's not the Pentagon.

Are you serious? That building is gigantic. Not to mention they have a data center that literally collects all electronic communication in the country.

Of course we do. We developed Stuxnet and a host of other viruses that have been attacking Iran. I can only imagine what we have going on in a lot of other places (China, for example).

What should the lawyer do instead? Condemn his own clients? She brought criminal proceedings against the people he's defending, so she's the accuser. It's not like the lawyer has something personal against her, it's his fucking job.

I think that only white people convicted of non-violent crimes and rich people should get private counsel. Everyone else should be assigned a lawyer. The quality of the lawyer gets worse as the heinousness of your crime increases. Sound fair?

Did Google pay you guys to post this?

I would look up the links but I know that there is nothing more than shoddy translations and fiery rhetoric from a man who is nothing more than a symbolic figurehead in his own country. If you think that that represents a serious threat to Israel and the United States, then I don't think you understand the discrepancy…

First, provide links to support what you're saying.

I don't agree with your last sentence. If Iran actually had the same drones as we do, do you think they would actually put them to use in other countries? Is there any doubt that military action would immediately be taken against them if they were to? The US uses drones with impunity anywhere that it wants, frequently…

From the person who uses the term "libtard" without a hint of irony.

Any evidence that Iran is actually trying to annihilate (nuclear-armed, US-backed) Israel is extremely shaky at best. It's mostly based on contested translations of Ahmadinejad rally speeches. To act as if it's a real possibility is excessive.

What are you referring to?

The fact that we are militarily stronger does not provide a moral justification for disobeying international law.

Have they? Can you provide a link? Why do you feel that Iran would ever attempt to attack Israel, given the fact that only one of those countries has nuclear weapons and the unequivocal backing of the United States?

Please provide me with concrete evidence that Iran seriously wants to, and is trying to, destroy another country in the world.

Until we stop deluding ourselves into thinking that "they hate us for our freedoms" and our military is used for nothing more than spreading Democracy to all the oppressed peoples of the world, nothing much will change. As long as we are the official force for Good, that's all the justification needed to hold…

Assuming this is completely true (a big assumption, I'll admit), we will have absolutely no moral ground to stand on if Iran starts using these to take out "imminent threats" to its security in the Middle East.