Good thing it has that massive bed and tow rating to carry the owner’s pride back home.

Good. Throwing cigarette butts on the street is vile.

And no CVT. CVT’s are like condoms, I do not use them.

And next you will tell me that I can’t fix everything with a hammer

“Dear wife, it’s a four seater. It’s a family car, let’s buy one.”

It’s a test mule, purposely clad and disguised to not give everything away.

The back end is one thing, but the taillight looks like an off-the-shelf part. Probably just a placeholder to let them test the important bits (think back about a year to the first Ford GT mule on the road)

Prototype:

Well it looks so generic that you can slap a bowtie on it and call it the new Chevy Traverse.

1. Because slippery shape.

Heck, I have a kid and I’ve gleefully turned my nose up at practicality in my fleet. I’m schlepping a single kid, not a sports team, I’m still ok with a tiny car. I’m ok with it specifically because I look at Europe (which contains Italy) and see how they don’t rely on SUVs and CUVs to tote their kids and crap. So an…

Killing cones.

This doesn’t appear to be private property, though. It’s street parking.

Fit>Versa

Not many people need a car better then a nissan versa also it is all want

Dude. Park them in the garage and stop being a dick.

This is why the depreciation curve is so flat on the Toyota Land Cruiser. It’s a vehicle you know was built to last for 25 years.

First gear: I don’t think the problem is that “luxury” cars only have branding to differentiate themselves nowadays. It’s normal for features to trickle downmarket until today’s entry-level models are better equipped than yesterday’s luxury car. Feature-wise, modern Lincolns, Cadillacs or Acuras are still (slightly)…

I remember when the Avalon first came out, basically everyone touted it as a solid alternative to the LS400 for about $15k less. (apples and oranges, but to the average buyer that's good advice)

HA!!