Verrall
Verrall
Verrall

That's not really a good deal at all. For 320 pounds, you can get a brand new iPad Mini with Retina (which is worth it, really). You're paying 480 pounds for an outdated model.

"As if that hasn't been done 1000 times."

What I'm taking away from this is the ingenuity of the producer(s) in creating this thing with a monetary investment under $500. Convincing people to donate time/expertise, or loan equipment/space/props, is still noteworthy.

I suppose, then, let me ask you this: if your orientation means you don't like kissing ladies (say, hetero female or gay male), do they get to complain obnoxiously about every achievement that has you romancing a woman?

Link, the king of ringouts? Sucked? I'm not sure if you're on point there.

Rushing offensive items usually means that you aren't spending your gold on a Sightstone or wards, and therefore you aren't creating enough vision for your team to get by. The video specifically mentions a Nidalee rushing Archangel's Staff — leaving the bottom lane dangerously low on vision.

No, there isn't. However, in League of Legends, teams can vote to surrender (you need 4/5 people to agree, but if there's someone AFK, you only need 3/4 of the remaining team members). So if being a team member down means you're going to lose, you can just end the game right there.

Riot's stated policy is that they don't want toxic players, and ban them, because they make the game worse for everyone else. And they DO get banned if they continue to misbehave after warnings.

They realized that it led to abuse. Turns out they get plenty of people on the Tribunal without the rewards anyway.

Riot hasn't given anyone IP for participating in the Tribunal in a long time.

Well, you could kind of count the 3DO.

- Maybe you should complain.

Designers need a ton more credit in the world today. This is absolutely true!

No, they don't. That doesn't mean that the ad itself wouldn't give the media something to blow up about. THAT's what makes me uncomfortable. I should have been a little more precise, I guess.

Fair enough. If "slightly uncomfortable" makes me a "little oversensitive," that sounds reasonable!

The video game industry already operates under a negative stigma: that we warp children's minds with violence. It's why we have things like the ESRB.

Yeah, what about my butthurt?

I said it made me uncomfortable, not that it was a surprise.

I admit, I got slightly uncomfortable when it shows the kid . . . and then, right after, men with guns shooting things.

Why on Earth would you want Elizabeth to shut up?