Jalopnik, Giz, and I09 are pretty well written and clear, but it seems lately the rest of the Gawker sites have just been phoning it in. Did you read the one about the terminal cancer kid in the Boxster?

I love how the replies to these articles are the Jalopnik equivalent to a Gawker "As a gay, minority female, I..."

They produce half the world's honey? Is that correct?

Yada yada, why doesn't anyone talk about horsetorque? That's what I want to know.

Come on, momma didn't raise no fool. Confident Rider Course scheduled for Aug 23. As far as track riding goes, that was kinda the whole point. If I can do it on my little bike I'm there in a second, that or find a Bondurant type place. I track a 993 and everything I've read say knowing how to ride on a track truly…

Yes and no. I'm still in the break in period, and the engine has a little more pep at the top which I haven't reached. Don't get me wrong, it's pretty slow when you're above 35, but the little thing handles so well for what it is. That's where the fun is. You can get Ohlins internals for the fork and adjustable rear…

Man, that little bike gets more looks and questions than anything else I driven. What I'm hoping is someone will make a 250 in the same vein as the Grom. I would like to have something in between the Grom and the big bikes without having to sacrifice those sweet looks and inverted fork.

When I was 22 I got a real, honest, post collegiate job. I had never ride a motorcycle on the road. I went down to the Ducati dealer and threw my leg over a beautiful 848 and filled out a credit application. Turns out I had no credit, and thank the good lord.

This sucks so much.

CEO/Owner Youabian Puma Automotibles

Do you think Popular Mechanics properly cited the film Woman in the Moon?

Yano that scene in Apollo 13, where they detach from the Saturn V and fire the S1c. Yea, you might feel it.

I submit to you, oh lord.

Also, you're making a Busch League economic mistake with only taking into account the fuel the rocket burns. Yes, fuel is a limited resource, but realize all the fuel, and energy in general, that would be burned to make a new rocket. Trucks, shipping, metal smelting, a whole workforce driving to and fro the rocket…

Sir, a more rocket economic method.

I figured for polite discourse, it was better to go for a face slap rather than the full on five-finger heart punch. How anyone can argue that this isn't totally a huge freaking deal makes me want to leave this planet on a non reusable rocket. Von Braun's head would explode if he saw what this thing can possibly do.…

I think you remember that being the idea, not the result. The shuttle was reusable, yes, but incredibly, astronomically complicated in design and operation. Turnaround was never what was originally planned, which was one criticism of the program. Please note that the Falcon is also a booster, the shuttle was an…

The extra fuel burned is cheaper than building a new rocket every time. How is commercial air travel economically feasible? Turnaround. A soft, dry landing allows for a quick turnaround, hence lower overall cost. Even a recoverable wet landing would require a complete rebuild. Considering the cost of the actually…

Listen, Tradio Guy, we know you're still upset, but loosen up. Howard does some amazing interviews, just last week he had Hugh Jassole, Eaton Beaver, and Gabe Athouse. All in one week!!!