I guess you could say her train of thought....

Boston.com also tweeted the same misspelling last night.

Looks like the general trend of Boston-area sports ignorance finally has its poster boy.

Juror B37, is that you?

So I can get a gun and start a fight with someone unarmed and then shoot them if it looks like they're going to beat me up? You really think that's a good precedent? Because it seems like a good way to get away with murder whenever you want.

There needs to be some way to disallow the "I was afraid he was going to take my gun" defense for the people who showed up with the gun in the first place. That just feels like a perverse gun-nut confrontation version of entrapment.

Especially considering the fact that if Zimmerman had STAYED IN HIS TRUCK and NOT FOLLOWED TRAYVON, he would have had nothing to be afraid of.

I don't want to hear about the "evidence." Its flawed no matter what because an unarmed citizen who got shot and died can't tell his side of the story. Its very convenient when you don't have any witnesses to say what happened otherwise or contradict your statement.

I've decided that if you follow a person and confront them, even after people told you NOT TO, you are responsible for what happens. You shoot the person? You go to prison! You get yourself killed? Sorry, but you shouldn't have been there! Done and done.

"Because – let’s be clear here – according to current Florida law, you can get a gun, follow an unarmed minor, call the police, have them explicitly tell you to stop following him, then choose to ignore that, keep following the minor, get into a confrontation with him and if at any point during that process you get…

Keystone is a better buy than Sam Adams. Penny swill > dollar pseudo swill any day.

From The Post's article: