Vauba
Vauba
Vauba

I thought Revelations was better than Brotherhood. I think a lot of the problem was just that it was very similar to the last game and people were getting bored with the same formula.

This game was about 30 hours too long. I was pretty bored with it by the end and after I finally finished it, I thought in retrospect that it wasn't really worth as much of my time as I had put into it.

Most of the season was great. When I re-watched it, I did find that the story about Jack's tattoos was the worst example of filler in the entire series.

The multiplayer experience is one that will differ depending on who you are with. My first time playing through the game was when it first came out and I didn't even realize I was playing online and had the beautiful experience the game should be. I played it a second time a few months later and my partner was

I found both inFamous games to not seem that different between hard and normal.

What about when we're looking at things in real life? We process a lot more information than what we see at 24 FPS.

I'm pretty sure I really liked the 48FPS. What I didn't like was the 3D. I think 3D can sometimes be fun but it does decrease the quality of the image. It adds blurriness, a weird flicker and the glasses mess with the brightness. So I found the experience to be a schizophrenic one with one technology that

FPS and Hz are not the same thing. FPS means how many different images are shown per second. Hz means how many times a TV refreshes it's display per second. So if you're watching a Blu-ray on a TV you have 24 images that are displayed per second and so the TV will display the same image for multiple Hz cycles. If

If I spent that much time playing Dynasty Warriors, I'd probably shoot a bunch of people too.

There was one hunting game that had quick time events where you were wrestling lions. It was the most redneck shit ever.

You're still not getting it. I am in agreement that annual COD and annual sports games for 360/PS3 are comparable in their lack of updates. The 360/PS3 version of the sports games have what could be described as "practically" nothing new, "essentially" nothing new or "virtually" nothing new etc. The new Wii

Would you prefer they did a Crysis 2 and release the PC version on time but don't add DirectX 11 until later when everyone has beaten the game already?

*posted in the wrong place

Not Really. I would be a good point if he were talking about the Xbox/PS3 versions of these sports games which are relatively minor updates each year. These Wii games are literally the same game repackaged except for a roster update.

I'm going to disagree about the part where Batman has great combat. It has great animation that adapts to your environment and has satisfying sound effects. But in terms of actually playing, it is not anything special. It is not challenging or deep in any way. I find it's basically button mashing mixed with some

Gears of War was influenced by RE4 but it was also very different unless you consider all games involving shooting to be the same.

No, the biggest problem with the game is not its deviation from what it used to be. The problem is that the game isn't very good. In principle I think if you want to make a Gears of War style game then you should make a new IP rather than try to turn Resident Evil into Gears of War. But if the game was a good Gears

Leon's campaign is also the closest to traditional RE, or at least 4&5. Chris's campaign is a full on military shooter with enemies that shoot back thus suggesting you use the cover system which is poorly done. Jake's campaign is more similar to Chris's too.

The problem is it's not a good game regardless of what style of gameplay it has gone to.