VashVashVash
VashVashVash
VashVashVash

Now there is a solution whose time has come!

Why not both?

If you have a band, you have a garage to practice in!

If the new owner doesnt put big SWAT letters on the side, he is missing a great opportunity.

It’s a compromise, like anything else. There is no shortage of companies hiring highly qualified, hard to replace workers.

It is possible, and at least to me, likely, that the companies with better manufacturing facilities are busy making other parts (presumably with more difficult requirements and higher profits). If this is correct, than than the two types of manufacturers (high/low productivity) aren’t actually competing at this time.

I agree that demand is a huge factor in this decision. The trouble with modern, productive manufacturing methods is that they are expensive, and you have to keep them busy.

In my experience, the risk typically isn’t (directly) in the payback for a modern factory being too far in the future. It’s in not being able to get all/most of the theoretical productivity gains from the new factory due to lack of skill/supply bottle necks/ internal politics etc. It’s usually a story of “If we could

If this firm bought a modern production line, it could afford to produce at a lower cost. As long as it could get enough orders to utilize its line, it could easily afford to pay its workers better (and provide them with proper safety gear), since it would need far fewer of them. In fact, it would have a vested

Because their employer is using very old production techniques. They offset the low productivity with a very large workforce, thus the low pay.

I understand, hope you don’t mind me asking. My run in with local motors is limited to a conference on additive manufacturers they (along with a few others) were holding during the last IMTS. I walked in being very excited to hear about how the envelope is being pushed in that field. And walked out very dissapointed,

In order to be a business, you have to have sufficiend revenue to cover your expenses, or at least have some realistic plan of accomplishing that. Rally fighters aren’t priced like veyrons.

It looks a lot like lightbot. A game that had my 8 year old troubleshooting loops for hours.

Interesting. 55 in how many years? Did they sell other products? If so, what were the biggest money makers?

3 reasons

The rally fighter is certainly a much better vehicle than all the printed nonsense. But tell me, how many have they made? How many have been sold to private buyers? Is that number over a dozen?

Damn it, not those guys again. They are not a car company, they are a grant sucking hype machine.

They need a racing league for these things.

I agree, but the ROI specifies that incredibly high altitude. I can’t think of a good reason for it, aside from making the system really expensive.

at 18,000 feet?