That's "prix fixe" isn't it?

Fuck your article titles Jezebel. Fuck them right to hell.

This article was not a discussion of black women, or whatever problems that group has finding mates. This was a discussion of this individual man and his interactions with HIS wife and children.

But it's true. It's none of your damn business. Stop being so racist.

What in the ever loving fuck!?! How racist you are! He owes no explanation for not loving and marrying a black woman. He loves who he loves. How dare you say, "that would require far more details about him than I have" and assume that you have the right to judge his choice of a life mate!!!

Way to sexualize helping your children get ready in the morning and reduce the value of what he is doing. I don't get it, there are articles all the time on here that complain about men doing the same thing.

Essentially your comments are the same as comments directed at Hilary Clinton about her fashion being bad, or at…

Can we stop with the imaginary boyfriends thing? It was funny once or twice, but really it's sort of reducing these men down to their subjective attractiveness. Think about it. Why is he our imaginary boyfriend? 'Cause someone decided he was hot and really super nice. Can we let him exist outside of his hotness and…

I'm dismayed as well. Jezebel gives MRA's an easy target with these kind of exaggerated headlines. And it's too bad, because there's a sensible discussion to be discerned amid all the indignation in the article above.

Scorsese said the names of seven directors he likes. He didn't rank them. He didn't say it was a definitive list of the best directors. He didn't say no one else besides these seven are any good. He just listed seven good directors. And because none of them were women, he's a sexist now?

I read that headline as "Scorsese explicitly thinks women aren't good directors," when upon investigation, it's clear it should have instead said "Scorsese highlights some favorite directors without mentioning any women because the industry is sexist and as such, women are underrepresented." I wish Jezebel's editors…

Too bad when you make a list of directors Scorsese should have included, you neglected to mention any trans or intersex filmmakers. Pot calling the kettle black?

Come. On. That headline is really, really misleading: Scorcese isn't calling these guys out as his favorite directors, he's specifically giving them kudos for being able to get their films financed—vision intact—within today's system. So yes, "Maybe he knew what he was doing by listing directors who get their work…

The No True Scotsman fallacy doesn't work in arts criticism. So Scorsese is obligated to praise filmmakers just because they're women?

I hate myself a little when I'm sucked in by these headlines. He did not say the best directors are men.

Most of those films listed are not very good, and none of them are groundbreaking cinema.

Seriously agree.
The red lines, the yellow lines. Look guys! She photoshopped herself!! The outrage!
WHY IS THIS A STORY. Who cares?
There are actual real things in this world to be concerned with. Staaahp.

Look, I know that we're all supposed to hate Kimmy for being an annoying attention whore, but she manages to keep herself in the news cycle 24/7, and has done so for several years, with our consent. If you want to be mad at somebody, be mad at the media—and the rest of America, for that matter—for keeping her antics…

I know/hope you're being sarcastic Mad because I largely love your articles and know you know that the whole your "Boyfriend, BFF, future husband, husband, cat, etc." is awful and awful.

Oh come on. Did anyone seriously think that was going to happen? Women can't even become priests, so how were they supposed to be "appointed cardinals".

there is a growing body of evidence that they might just be a big waste of your money