V3R1TAS
V3R1TAS
V3R1TAS

Settle down, I love the game the way it is just like I said in the last sentence. I'm just saying that Studio Ghibli hasn't always been a cutesy childish animation studio. They've come out with a lot of adult friendly movies as well. What I was saying was that with the difficulty of this game a more hardcore feel

I was having this EXACT issue all last night when I was playing. I got the Turbandit no problem but the freekin banana monster just would not fall in love with me. I had to have killed like 30 of those damn things. Now I'm too high of a level and they keep running away!

" I didn't feel so much Nausicaa as I felt...Ponyo, very child friendly world"

"The only real flaw the game has is the party member AI can be troublesome (it either should've been programmed to be more adaptive or they should've given the player more specific control)"

I think it has a lot to do with how each reviewer played the game. I'm finding the game fairly easy(ok, maybe not easy, but average) but I'm taking my time, playing through every side quest I can and leveling up whenever I can. I feel like the reviewers calling it hard/tedious/cheap might have been rushed through the

I'm not a HUGE JRPG fan but I always liked FF games and I loved FFX and I'm loving Ni No Kuni. Yes, I would say it's for you.

I read it as, the reviewer not being able to compare it to a SINGLE game because it borrows ideas from multiple games. I could be wrong though.

I don't even know if I could commit to that many. Mine would be:

"Touch Screens Are a Quicker, More Intuitive Way to Interact with Your Computer"

I noticed it...an indication that there is one on the home page would be nice though(like, before you actually click on the article)...that's just me nitpicking though.

I'd like to see retro studios do a 2D metroid. Like they did with DKCR.

Alternate to 3: Give me more XP if I'm doing good. Like a worthwhile amount more. For example, in Halo 4, if you win a game you only get 200 more points and then like 1300 for just finishing the game. That makes no sense to me. If I get 35 out of the 60 kills in a game, I should be getting a hell of a lot more XP than

I see a lot of people knocking this because it's unnecessary but I think it should have happened years ago. Think about it in a family setting. You could have your weekly calendar (chores, bills, etc.) displayed on there and you'll be able to modify it wherever you are(same with a work calendar). You could also have

Yea, I just saw another article saying that it'll be around $1000...I don't see this thing selling much at all (like you said in your original post)...who's going to buy a gaming pc for $1000 and it runs linux, which 90% of the population doesnt even know it exists, let alone have used it before.

The gaming industry is VERY different from the 5th and 6th gen console battles, you can't even begin to compare them to this coming next gen. With games like COD and Halo, gamers have much more loyalty to specific consoles than they did before(if only for the fact that they're so familiar and comfortable with the

After finishing the whole series so far this year (twice) It's now one of my favorite shows ever if not, number 1. Love the show...Like the others have said start with the "new" Doctor who that started in 2005.

That's unfortunate, but some of the aspects of that are pretty unnecessary. (SSD, quad core proc)...if it is set to be in the $1000 range I have even less hope for this being successful.

You're high on crack if you think a $500 gaming PC wont play the latest games. I just built one for around $600 that can play all of the latest games 90% of them on high settings. Remember, it has linux on it. So that's around $100 right there, that Valve wont have to pay to MS.

I see a lot of people saying that the price tag will be too high. There's two things that Valve has to worry about more than the price tag.

It definitely won't be $1000. Maybe 500 or 600(which is what 360 and ps3 were at launch) not $1000.