You can't judge a game from 5 minutes of gameplay, that's ridiculous.
You can't judge a game from 5 minutes of gameplay, that's ridiculous.
They were expected to win because they deserved to win.
I agree with Gyaruson, try bastion and portal 2. At the very least, Bastion. It's like $15, you can't really go wrong with a game that cheap.
Like I said in a post above...Jack of all trades, master of none.
I'm right there with you. I loved Skyrim but it doesn't come close to the first time I played Portal 2.
I agree, while I loved the game, not really sure why, it had bad combat, the story was ok (I wouldn't say boring, but not great) and the dungeons do get a little tedious. But there's just something about that game that I love.
What you may not realize is nothing like that has been done before. Dynamic music is almost more of a technical feet than an audio. I'm sure it took a lot of programming to get it just right. That's why it won, it introduced a totally new type of music/audio to the gaming industry and it helps the medium move forward.
Seeing your post really makes me want to try out BF3 with my Turtle Beach's volume way up.
Have you played it?
Jack of all trades master of none.
Hell yea Bastion and Supergiant!
See, I didn't know that he previously worked for Ubisoft. So I take that statement back. Again, like I said before, I don't know the guy.
You're right, the glasses thing was stupid and a dubious reason, truthfully I was just throwing stuff in there to make his douchiness more credible.
Example 1: Saying that all Japanese games suck.
How and why do you know so much about that video?
I can't wait for this game it looks amazing (even though the dev is a cocky douche).
I know it's probably some kind of "English is not my first language" thing but I have to say it...you spelled 'titles' wrong like three times in that post.
Read the two comments below yours...I rest my case.
This guys game hasn't even been release yet, why is he even on a panel at all?
"All they create is FPS games and military shooters."