I would have thought that the Monaco GP would have been higher on the list.

I’ve always wondered why wheels are not equipped with a few simple blades to make them spin up with airflow.

How about using it for a bit of boost at takeoff? Getting a plane to move from 0 is clearly not efficient with thrust vs air. Having a bit of traction-based momentum would allow for some more efficiencies I would guess.

Here’s why Kimi Räikkönen is probably smiling somewhere next to a bowl of ice cream because of the rules released today.

Holly mother of god.

Looking forward to a post explaining these naming conventions and structures to us muggles Tyler!

Looks like aero flipped him. I assumed it was the grass, but it really looks like backing up at that speed lifted him. Wonder if the new aero kits had a role.

Poster image shows a lot of steering input for an oval... Can’t end well.

That still would not allow my mom to get the point.

I’ve always found that this jet’s shape looked like it wanted to go fast. A bit like a sprinter leaning forward crossing the line.

Mr. Children

It will only be fixed when a massive marketing genius figures out how to explain to car buyers what an automated manual actually is. I haven’t the first clue as to how to do that.

They explain it here: https://plus.google.com/11719598513016…

Ah dude, where is the right audio track for the RS video?

Laguna Seca edition?

TG has always somehow been able to make long, boring drives on the highway interesting to watch. I can only imagine the work required to do so, and this gives us a great insight. Thanks!

I did not know it at the time (I am a North American, so rally coverage sucks), but he is the reason why I wanted a WRX for years before I got two back to back in 2009 and 2014.

Subaru can thank the higher powers that it took this long to be really blown out of the water in the hot hatch power race.

(Obligatory)

That last sector’s high-speed complex (Porsche curves?): OMFG.