You liked Arcade Fire several years ago, didn't you? ;)

Meanwhile, I still cannot land the jet on the NES Top Gun game.

Shit. #Busted

Shit. #Busted

I wasn't suggesting that the gentrification of that area is a good or bad thing. Just wondering where the original occupants were chased off to (assuming the area was residential to begin with).

Honest question: where did all the poor people who lived there go?

I'm just going to copy/paste what I have already written in this thread. In the future, read the entire thread before commenting. It'll save everybody time.

I should probably rephrase my point, since I'm using Midwest prices as a reference point. These cigarettes will probably cost at least twice as much as the leading brand of cigarettes in any given city. With that said, when confronted with the options, I don't see too many people buying these. People may buy them to…

Whatever. You get my point.

Here in KC, they're about $4, so set that $10 price tag to NYC inflation. Point being, they'll be significantly more expensive than other cigarettes.

I think the fact that a pack of these cigarettes will cost at least $10 (pure speculation) will help people smoke less and eventually quit.

They probably spent six figures on research, designing and focus groups to move a few letters one pixel over. Capitalism and marketing is a bizarre thing at times.

Sometimes, the rival school has a better program of whatever it is you want to get into. For example, a Kansas fan who wants to get into journalism will be better off going to Missouri, an equally bitter rival as Louisville and UK.

The biannual Gawker Media attempt of minimizing their tendency to generate clickbait headers. I swear someone else at Gawker wrote pretty much the same thing within the past 6 months.

Why anyone would want to go hangout with a bunch of white, suburban yuppies is beyond me. Sometimes, I wish security would have denied me entrance whenever my friends would drag me to Power and Light District. This Ballpark Village sounds exactly the same. It's for white suburbanites and tourists, i.e. HELL!

Ohhhh, gotcha!

That's not what journalism is. Journalists are to report facts, not opinion. That's why newspapers have an entire section devoted for an Opinion. Journalists report so that everyone else can form an opinion based on those facts. When journalists start infusing their opinion into their articles, they run the risk of…

Either way, Gawker needs to make up their mind on whether or not they're bloggers or journalists. They claim to be a blog when accused of biased slants, but they're journalists otherwise. Very inconsistent.

It sounds like Gawker Media trying to downplay the practice. You're not denying it nor are you necessarily excusing it. But it does sound like "People have been doing this for over 100 years...what's the big deal?!"