She STARTED the conversation talking about BDSM. HE seemed weirded out by that but continued talking about sex because SHE brought it up. She then said she was into pornography. He then continued down that same line and she stopped the conversation.

Posting opinions you disagree with doesn’t make someone a troll. Now, if they fail to support those views with facts and logic and continue making demonstrably and objectively inaccurate statements, that would qualify as trolling because they’re obviously arguing in bad faith. Also, an opinion you disagree with isn’t…

This is absurd. The goalpost for what is and isn’t creepy is entirely related to who is participating in the conversation.

“Thank you for creating a bondage and sado masochism “Yuri””

This is a tough one. It looks to me like she’s trying to communicate on a professional level, but he’s seeing it as a personal communication, then he just goes overboard. While some of the questions look like genuine attempts to better understand her work, the entire text as a whole is pretty aggressive and not a good…

And his conversation was inappropriate... how exactly? It’s not like he sent a dick pic or even solicited nudes from her. This is called flirting, people. If it makes you uncomfortable, then stop talking to other people.

That conversation, while cringeworthy and tremendously unprofessional, is not really the kind of thing that should cause a scandal.

This is nonsense. How is he supposed to know what ‘creepy’ is? She is the one who started a creepy conversation for thanking him for his bdsm character, to which he seems visibly off[it by his first line.

“Man who makes games featuring sexually suggestive women is personally thanked by sexually suggestive woman for his sexually suggestive women and then accused of being sexually inappropriate.”

“Man who makes game featuring sexually suggestive women makes sexually suggestive comments to women.”

These are some “first date” style questions. I don’t see blatant harassment, but I guess you could infer that it’s coming from a place of mock interest and may have devolved from there.

I don’t know what to think. I guess I was expecting way worse. Which says a lot about the massive shift we’ve had in recent times,…

Oh f this chick. Seriously. You don’t get to seek out a guy with comments about bdsm, transition into how you like sex art and then suddenly act uncomfortable with a conversation YOU initiated and are PERPETUATING.

From the trolls:

Honestly y’all this is a really bad take. It seems like she definitely could have done more due diligence about the appropriate chain of command that should be followed before accepting an animal into her rescue. But that dog *couldn’t walk*. She was severely malnourished, covered in excrement, and had a badly…

just adding: the sudden call for obedience and lawfulness in comparison to more recent articles is also odd. all around, this seems like something that should be applauded rather than shamed (again, especially considering the dog’s condition).

assuming that the influencer is telling the truth about the dog’s condition (which is at least somewhat supported by the dog needing a wheelchair)... i wonder how much this differs from saving an abused/neglected animal from a nearby yard? the headline makes it sound like she just wanted a dog she saw and took it for…

I’m genuinely confused as to how a paralyzed animal can help someone “complete daily tasks.”

Except they’re not really, they’re making fun of his wife who, as far as I can tell, did nothing more that want some cheese.

Is it that fucking hard to give someone a goddamn break?

He wanted Mi Cocina to see it. People sometimes post things they shouldn’t when they get frustrated. It’s really not that funny. And he definitely wasn’t hoping for this. But keep hanging on that “public forum” nonsense.