Dude. I hope you're not serious about what you just said. That would be like living in the 60's watching an episode of Star Trek saying the same thing about the communicators made by the props department where 30 or so years later you've got one in your hand. Even conceptual art allows the free flow of ideas to…

Firefighters have been carrying the functional equivalent of this for over 60 years. Get yourself a Halligan Tool.

I don't understand, why would I need wooden bench seats in a zombie outbreak?

And that is why you'd die first.

Actually, you posted a picture of a B-1, which was confusing given the comment that went along with it.

Only if we could bend laws of physics for aesthetics, right?

"Designer"? Ok, show me something like that made by an Aircraft Engineer now.

Saw this on CNN.com the other day. Best jet design I've ever seen. So tired of the flying tubes. Lift bodies are the future.

Technically "Candy Crush" was the original release. It was a blatant Bejeweled clone where you just sort of racked up points with a time limit. "Candy Crush Saga" is the version that most people call Candy Crush, with different play fields, the world map, and the creepy long-armed ginger.

King has basically been doing…

No, it absolutely is born out of jerkiness. King.com is making money hand over fist, entertaining notions of going public, and they have to turn an indie game into collateral damage just because some piddly little bullshit might (but probably won't to any visible extent) chip away at their bottom line? I'm sorry, but…

This is pretty common practice. If a company/brand doesn't file these silly trademark complaints about EVERYTHING, then if the time comes that you need to file an legit trademark complaint the defense will ask why you never tried protecting your trademark before. It's posturing, and for the nitpicky stuff (like this)…

http://thecandyjam.com/

from the site;

Solution: King.com should drop the unnecessary last word from their boring, lifeless, unoriginal names!

But when you choose to make a game simulating what is a very serious, controversial topic, you have a responsibility to handle it carefully, whether you asked for that responsibility or not. It'd be like making a sim game about running a 19th century southern plantation and balking at the idea that it should handle…

I really need to make this into a meme or something, because I keep saying it.

If your argument is that ebooks represent an inferior product, how about using your position to make a better product?

This graph should be normalized for population, since 1920 held a significantly lower population than 2000. The increase would still be evident and the graph would be more honest.

I WON THE GAME