They made their decision and it was a bad decision. 

And articles like this help me make an informed decision about which developers I support.

100%. People would have dunked on the skinny woman’s life being “changed” no matter what, but if the actress had just played this a bit differently (or the director directed her to play it differently), I think it wouldn’t have been nearly as remarkable. But after she gets the Peloton, at no point does she look like…

If I had the space for it, I would also love a Peloton for Christmas. But I do get the pushback that commercial was cheesy and cringy. People love to hate influencers which is what the woman represented by her vlogging in the commercial. And she just seems overly sentimental about how much a stationary bike changed…

..Cwheel of Fortune?

Apple has previously confirmed it does not charge automakers. The only cost involved is from the initial integration into the automaker’s system development, which I’m sure is the same or close to the same for every company.

this is what it looks like when a failson tries to make a joke at florida’s expense and didnt think it through properly.

He is Florida man.

He fucking lives here in Florida already.

used game sales won’t be cannibalized by digital games, but by subscription services.

You should hate yourself . . .

I absolutely hate myself for this but second from the left is Teresa Guidice who has four daughters and no sons. However, Melissa in the middle has a son and a husband I can DEFINITELY see doing this in a few years.

Not really, Instagram by default formats everything into a 1:1 format. It probably was originally filmed vertically. :P

It frustrates me that idiots like these can somehow afford nice cars, but all I can afford is a super used minivan - despite having a Bachelor’s and two Master’s degrees.
I guess it’s my fault for being a teacher and having multiple kids, though.

I mean, fair play on Gravity, but lol at criticizing films like Spaceballs and Total Recall for being unrealistic.

“In olden days, it was said that there’s a sucker born every minute and two to take him. Considering today’s population count, we estimate there’s a sucker born every 7.6 seconds, and 345 to take them.”

Let’s be real here, it’s probably due to some quirk in the Chinese justice system and/or some details we’re not privy to just form an article on kotaku.

According to the wording the guy who spent $1.4 mil was ordered to pay another $13K to the random person who bought the character on the game’s auction site. So the random who spent $552 on the character got almost 20x his money back.

The company canceled the transaction, so the plaintiff(ie. the original owner) Still owns the account.

I’d be interested in an article regarding why China and to some extent Korea have such a fundamentally different attitude to Pay2Win games. I can’t even imagine how it’s possible to spend that much on a game, much less so why someone WOULD.