Why?  I don’t have that much money to give.  That’d be a pretty stupid tax policy.

If it were that high, and someone offered to pay you $200,000 to do something, would you do it for $18,000 if you already made $10 million that year?

Just curious, did you read the article where it fully explained how we already have this marginal tax rate system? Asking for a friend.

If that tiny minority is negatively affecting everyone else by sucking up and hoarding all the money while buying off politicians to break down rights the rest of us have spent decades trying to earn then I see no issue with it. 

First, it doesn’t ‘hose’ anyone. It’s called ‘paying your fair share’. You pay more because you have more. Don’t want to pay more? Give it all away! Or, work for less. Problem solved.

Honestly this policy is a no-brainer. It impacts so few voters yet brings in millions of dollars. The only reason it doesn’t get traction with voters is that we Americans are easily confused by percentages (which, ironically, we could correct in future generations with the additional monies).

I’m less bothered by the mechanics and more bothered by the... output.

HOA Should start by having their building towed. Fuck that patch.

Well, they weren’t wrong about it being a future issue. They just failed to mention that it also happened to be a past and present issue...

Car dealers are so unpopular that a jury can’t wait to slap them with punitive damages that are 287x greater than the actual damages. These are my kind of people, because for every successful civil suit against dealerships there are most likely greater than 287 unsuccessful suits.

The trouble is, like most of us working poors, this dude has neither time or money to mount a legal challenge, even if he might win.  The price of admission is too high.

Judging from the quality of this stucco patch, I think he could brush some white nail polish on the car and call it a day.

I work for a commercial real estate company much larger than this one. It would be interesting to see if this policy stood up to a legal challenge. Landlords do have some power when it comes to dealing with eyesores, but this hardly qualifies. It seems to me that the renter may have a case against the landlord based…

Read the paperwork bro, you gave Mark Zuckerberg the right of prima nocta to all your children.

It’s on a piece of paper that means its the right thing.

So say that if that’s what you meant.

The problem with this take is that if I know how to load ISOs I probably have the technical know-how to make an emulator box that runs a bit faster and supports analog for a bit less money.

But wink wink, oops, turns out they just forgot to put any security on this thing at all and you can run a few software commands and load the entire library from USB.

The whole point of this article was in regards to Sony and its decisions. It created the PS Classic, chose the 20 games to put on it, and set the initial $100 price point. Saying “someone else found a way to improve upon it but it’s illegal” isn’t really relevant to the conversation and we shouldn’t give Sony any…

ahh, the people who come to these posts to say why dont you just hack and load all your roms you illegally downloaded!

“Hey guys, just do crime, okay?”