TurboFool
TurboFool
TurboFool

I came here to say the same. The way some of the cars in the film looked implied they were classics that had been modded with hover tech. Made them make a lot more sense, even at the time. Cars like the cop car, which were clearly more recently designed, looked dramatically different enough, without weird wheel

Yes. Missing the point of the entire car. Missing the point that this isn't a mass market production car. Missing the point that how it looks right now isn't that relevant as they're not trying to sell huge numbers. Missing the point that your opinion of its appearance means jack against their goals for it. The end.

Right. So the 21+ people telling you the same thing are the trolls, not the guy missing the entire point. Got it.

Based on the history of this thread and its comments, any observer can clearly see which of us is the troll. One persistently refuses to recognize that a mere opinion of whether an element of the car is ugly isn't relevant to its importance in the overall purpose of the car, while the other is merely pointing out his

I know far more about business than you seem to realize, and far more than you seem to know about this car's purpose and the reasons it's designed the way it is. More importantly, I know how to actually track a train of thought and concept and not bring unnecessary details into it. The point isn't about whether they

You realize this isn't a mass-market car, right? This car has nothing to do with turning a profit. This car exists to prove a point, win a bet in a sense, and make progress. This is proof of concept. They're producing only a few hundred. This isn't, "hey, we're going to sell a hundred thousand of these and make

The aerodynamics are almost the entire ballgame here. "[not] that important?" I guess the carbon fiber wasn't that important, either, then. Yes, it's important. Every bit was important. The entire point was to improve it as much as possible. Everything counts, and the aerodynamics are a huge part of it. Sorry you

I don't see much evidence that Sony has the best interest of gamers in mind. They proved time and again they didn't with the PS3, especially at launch, and later with their massive security breaches and other missteps. I see no reason to believe that massive corporation has my best interests in mind any more than

I don't see why they're mutually-exclusive. Microsoft's a massive company, with a huge number of subdivisions. There's no reason they can't have a division that focuses on media functionality AND divisions that ensure the gaming functionality is at least as good as the PS4. I just don't see the need to focus the box

The users held it back, not Sony. But otherwise I agree with you.

1. No. I want the Kinect to actually have value. It has none if it's optional.
2. Consoles don't support previous-gen peripherals nearly EVER. What world are you in?
3. Those concepts don't computer. I'm all for cheaper digital download prices, just not seeing a direct conncetion.
4. Why? No need. We have USB 3.0 ports.
5.

No, it doesn't. They killed the features that relied on it, too. It's pretty cut-and-dry.

They'd have to change the entire way the discs are sold and how they work over again? Pretty difficult, actually.

Crap. How do I choose between siding with the worst scum on earth, and the paparazzi?

Except not all of us HAVE that luxury. I agree with the other sentiments. As a kid, I was a home-schooled loner. That aspect of the games SUCKED, as I had few friends, and none played Pokemon.

When you word it that way, you describe a useful and powerful tool that isn't anything like the comment threads I see on a daily basis, that are made up of little more than whining by inept users, fanboy wars, and trolls. Yes, occasionally there's real feedback, but the signal-to-noise ratio is too poor to actually be

There are better ways to collect useful feedback than comment threads.

I heard MASSIVE groans from the audience on my feed, as was appropriate. That was a poorly-chosen phrase, and I know it gave me serious pause.

I'm trying so hard to find a way to be outraged by all of this, but I'm failing. I get that there are some people this will inconvenience. But I'm having a hard time seeing how any of those people could work with almost any modern gaming situations. Steam's no better, I'll be shocked if the PS4 isn't similar, and even

I'm sorry, but what opportunity was this woman given to get out of her car to check on the pedestrian? She was mobbed almost instantly by angry people who began to vandalize her car. Only an idiot would get out of their car in this situation. She could have been killed.