Yes, but it also appears to give advice underneath it to back it up, and suggests 8 glasses as the MINIMUM. My initial point was the starting point, and advice, are based on outdated information. Anyone who sees that will have it subconsciously reinforce the false information and they're likely to stick to it.

Right-click it in the notification area and click "Check for Updates." It'll then basically just send you to a download in the browser which you'll have to install.

Good to see it start with the outdated canard about drinking eight glasses of water a day. Not only does the actual amount of water needed per day vary from person to person (body weight, metabolism, and a variety of other factors) as well as level of physical activity that dehydrates them at various levels ensuring…

A trained cashier can scan and bag my groceries far, far faster than I can. And I used to handle a register. Now watch all those dingbats in front of you at self check out who take 30 seconds to figure out how to scan ONE item and tell me it's faster.

Yes, but people write contracts between one another constantly that are enforced in court that have no involvement with state agencies or outside companies. By your logic a contract drawn up between two parties that doesn't touch a state agency can't be enforced ever.

Well, by that logic all contracts ever are null and void.

Except in this case they have a signed agreement between BOTH sets of parents PREDATING the birth of the child. So this isn't merely about, "We don't believe you trying to shirk your duty," it's a case of saying, "We don't care that you made a written arrangement with the parents that you had no financial obligation…

At the end when she got it back she was much calmer, and I was pretty sure I heard "iPhone."

Pretty sure it's a case, and pretty sure she actually said "iPhone" a couple of times.

Are Chinese girls notably different from American girls in their ability to think up and orchestrate a dumb YouTube video?

I have two kids, thank you, and I know exactly how they react. I also know how I was raised, and how I turned out. And yes, you kind of DO need a study to understand whether there's any truth to the likelihood that kids will be traumatized by this. Merely assuming they'll fixate is hardly evidence of harm.

Who said anything about tasteful or artsy? A naked woman is enough for them to call it pornographic, and that's hardly anything harmful or shocking.

It can dramatically alter the development of the child? According to whom? I'm pretty sure the parents freaking out, and putting this and their kids all over the news was the only thing that has a shot of altering development of the child. A few quickly-viewed and deleted photographs of something the kid has no…

We have no indication that these photos WEREN'T merely nudity. And what's the difference to a 5-year-old, anyway?

We should legalize polygamy. There's no logical reason it's against the law. Nothing's wrong with nudity, either, and marijuana does, in fact, need to be legalized. None of that compares in any remote way to pedophilia. Get a grip on reality.

I find it EXCEPTIONALLY difficult to find any articles or studies not backed by religious or anti-pornography sources. That's why I was asking for a citation from you, as I consistently find when the biased junk science is boiled away from the arguments about pornography, nothing is left.

I remember things from when I was 3. Others younger. That's not the argument. The argument is that he's young enough that the photos are meaningless to him without context, and if the family hadn't freaked out about them they could have been played off easily. No harm was done.

Citation for that claim? Sexuality's normal. I can't imagine a few thousand years ago it was unusual for kids to see their parents and neighbors going at it, and in plenty of societies I imagine there's not much concern to hide sex from them. I find it highly unlikely that normal porn would screw up a kid that age, or…

The kid's 5. The photos are meaningless to him without you freaking out or explaining them to him. No "damage" was done to the kid, only to your fear of having to explain basic biology to him.

Every computer problem is a virus. Because virus writers love to make software that makes your mouse skip around the screen, or your monitor flicker, or your email to stick in your outbox, or for your web pages to sometimes load without the CSS, or your browser to crash when you load too many tabs with Flash in them,…