Nope, changing one's mind isn't lying, outside of political attack ads.
Nope, changing one's mind isn't lying, outside of political attack ads.
Where did I say explorer.exe isn't an application? Nowhere, that's where.
You didn't speed up Windows 7, you removed two seconds of boot time from Windows 8 which will rarely be seen in an office environment. And you didn't add features, you removed them by rolling Explorer back to 7's. But again, you're redefining concepts to suit your ends. It's impossible to argue with someone who does…
Well, I'm lost with what YOU are trying to argue. I'm not lost by the situation, only by your arguments and complaints against things I haven't said. I'm quite clear on what's going on with the software and its pricing, I'm just lost by what you're trying to say about it, when it doesn't seem to connect to anything.
So, in other words... my clever passwords are working perfectly, since I'm already doing all of this. My passwords are random, not based on ANYTHING external, use special characters in non-typical places, and they're unique to each site. At worst if I'm hacked, I have to change one site.
Wow. This is such an utter mess that I can't even bother. You've lost all comprehension of how completely warping how Windows 8 works for the "benefit" (ha!) of your users will screw them and you in the long run, and have so little comprehension of the underpinnings of Windows 8 that you actually think I'M the…
No, it is NOT the same thing. How utterly lost are you by this concept? The Win key takes you to the Start screen, which isn't an APP, it's the Start screen. When you hit it again, it CLOSES the Start screen. Exact same action as before, as ever.
I could say that, but why would I, really?
The Win key is NOT intended to switch between apps. Where on earth did that idea come from? It's intended, alone, to simply open the Start screen, and when hit again, to go back to where you were. Period. Just like how it worked in prior versions of Windows. Combined with other keys, such as Tab, it THEN does other…
It wouldn't so much coax me over as allow me to consider them again. I'm with Sprint now, which I've been happy with, but I'm frequently hit with reasons I'm disappointed to not be on a GSM carrier. But as AT&T and T-Mobile didn't have unlimited Internet, they weren't options. Now T-Mobile's back in the running for…
Try MonoPrice. Even cheaper, and their other cabling selection is awesome.
I had a customer at a Best Buy tell me they had bought a hard drive with a Firewire interface at another store because the rep there had informed them they'd get higher-quality transfers of their photos by using Firewire instead of USB. I was so incredibly angry for the rest of the day.
They go all the way to 1.1. It's amazing what you can get out of that extra tenth of a bit.
No, actually, there's can't be better quality with a larger TV with HDMI cables. There can't be ANY difference in quality with an all-digital cable. It can only be in a working or non-working state. So he's entirely wrong.
Wow. You are going to get STOMPED into the ground in replies for your blatant lack of comprehension of digital cable technology. And it will be very entertaining to watch. Pass the
Agreed. I so want Bluetooth to take over for this, but every time I say, "I'm finally going Bluetooth" I start using one and then fight with the computer for a couple minutes to notice it, or for it to wake up quickly, or all sorts of other issues.
Amen. Bitching about a change is much more enjoyable for some than actually getting used to, or learning how to work around, said change.
Research has found that Dvorak is, indeed, technically faster. There ARE keyboard layouts that allow people to type faster than QWERTY for a wide variety of reasons. So no, not all layouts are equal once learned. But the real issue that relearning a layout after already being well-trained on one comes with such a…
Why would you hit the Win-key while ON the start screen? What would be the point of doing so? You're already AT the destination. Just start typing.
I'm utterly lost here. You tried to claim that the extra cost over downloaded form was due to the cost of shipping a disc, printing, and the retailer. That accounts for the difference from the $39.99 download price to the $69.99 hard-copy price. This article and the comment you were replying to have NOTHING to do with…