Aren’t republican policies better for women in the long run compared to the SJW madness?

It depends on what blogs you read, if a news network has chosen a negative narrative, then every story would have to come out as negative with anything positive being either ignored or mocked.

The media does lie though, or at least twists the facts in a way that the story changes the meaning completely. It’s gotten to a point where you watch the news and then go read the blogs to know what really happened.

I believe it has been debunked as in he does this weird “limp wrist” hand movement mocking his many opponents in general, not just this particular reporter.

Could you please give examples of what kind of suffering you are expecting?

Does the internet also know who their “hero” happens to be? lol

What happened in June and October 2013?

I think 280 means, writing a thought in double tweets, all his latest tweets are like that, you have to read the bottom first and then up.

Thanks.

It doesn’t have Ctrl+Shift-V, a single most important shortcut for a browser. Without it, your emails will look like a clown formated them.

I’m all for an intelligent humor, like that voice over guy reading Trump’s tweets, it shows talent and creativity. This however reads more like a painful agony, a vindictive agenda from the lack of brain power or arguments.

IDs? Are you literally a Nazi?

Is this, the “if it didn’t work the first time, double down on absurdity” type of article? Cue a series of piss humor posts on Giz for two days (a technology blog).

Unfortunately, the only idiots here, are the so called journalists, frantically trying to save faces. This is an equivalent of an audience throwing the rotten tomatoes at the speaker while they keep explaining themselves, without realizing the show is over.

Right, the enemy, aka the globalist group, did want me to vote for their prefered candidate, I kindly denied the offer.

You all got trolled by /pol.

Having cleared the 1st amendment out of the way, what kind of protection does a person have against a company ruling, for example, it takes real labor hours and mental/physical work to earn subscribers and followers, all that, years of work can go ‘poof’ at a whim of a moderator. Who would compensate the thousands of…

I’m discussing the First Amendment vs private business issue, not this particular case of harassment.

Wow, as tolerant and open minded I am, I think openly wishing death upon someone is a bit too much.

Call me an idealist, but I believe the best way to be immune to any sort of influence is to not be corrupt in a first place. Imagine how little of an impact the breach would have had if there was nothing incriminating to hide.