You do know that developers finish their game several months before release? They use this time when the when the entire team is together to create extra content. You're not forced to buy it. Don't people understand that?

It's actually Half Life 3, they've just renamed it to Left 4 Dead 3 in order to hide it from fans. It's so obvious.

Pfff. Think of the Wonders you can build there. Thanks to having a mountain tile next to your city. You can build Machu Pichu and Observatories and other things.

Okay, you've stated right there that it isn't a moral choice. But, I disagree. That doesn't make you wrong, or me right, it's subjective. You found what I said "wrong", now you're doing the EXACT same thing. Making a subjective point view. Except, you're stating it like it IS objective truth. It isn't.

It is a shame I reneged. I mean, I only came to this article as I was linked it by a friend. I was asked a question by Owen Good, I answered it. Just because you don't like it doesn't make my view any less important.

I've told everybody why I brought it up - Money. Why does money suddenly make something morally wrong or not? Just because nobody makes money from Skyrim Swords or any other non-licensed weapon, should we just ignore it? Should we not question it? Should we not go "Is it a moral choice to buy a violent video game that…

I know. I was just making a point on why morality is suddenly being questioned when money becomes involved.

Just got a link from a friend to Boston Marathon Game and noticed my many replies, yours is one of the few that stood out, so I'll give you my time.

I happened to be given a link to a Kotaku article about the Boston Marathon Game and noticed I had 55 Notifications about my post, however, yours stood out the most, so I am going to give you my time and reply.

Thing is. Why did Owen Good even ask a question if the answer is always "You've made a moral choice" - What's the fucking point?

Thank fuck one of the "old crew" (or at least acts like it) still is here.

I am sure you are very familiar with some of it. Not all of it. Not every single act that happens. I know lots of stuff that happens too, but I don't know all of it. The point I was making, which I explained, was if you're ignorant of something, you cannot make a judgement of something. I don't know the full, 100%…

No, it isn't

I have a feeling people are missing my other replies.

As I've said in other replies. I know. My view is my view, it's not objectively true.

So, you take the stance that morality is objective and no universal standard exists? If you do, that's a very hard thing to prove. But at least we're having a nice chat. (That's not sarcasm, I enjoy talks)

That's nice. Exactly why would that be? Am I not allowed to have differing opinion? Am I not allowed to voice it?

Wait, what? I've given my opinion and I've given my reason, what's wrong with that? As I said, there is a website called The Flat Earth Society, who believe the Earth is flat, NASA is lying and science is wrong. Are they not allowed to think this?

Yoor slurring your speech, or text, I should see somebody about that.

I know. I never said it wasn't a moral question. I just said I don't find it one. I didn't say "IT FUCKING ISN'T THIS IS OBJECTIVE TRUTH MOTHER FUCKER!". I posted under Troublehalf, which is assumed to be a online pseudonym of a person and therefore assumed people would go "Huh, that's not my opinion, here is mine,…