Wear earphones and listen to some music. Problem solved, unless you like that kind of confrontation.

If her only option is to move, then why isn't she at least entitled to emotional and economic losses, as she claims? Oh yeah. Always need to sell the racism angle.

Child Pornography wasn't statutorily outlawed in England until 1978. Seems permissive to me.

This applies equally to Louis C.K.'s joke about S. Palin's "retard-making cunt." Although I don't recall such a fuss among the progressives, oddly.

Here's what happens when white people move into your neighborhood.

If you'll read his post closely (it's less than 25 words—should be doable, although I don't know you), he didn't say that "racism isn't a thing any more." He said not everything had to be about color.

Ohk is a racist for foolishly thinking that petty squabbles based on race were disappearing, rather than being encouraged by progressives? I'd say he's more of an idealist.

Reporting on a planet isn't a criticism of existing cosmology; this piece on the other hand is a critical look at social structures. The former wouldn't even have a solution. Annalee suggests this issue does. That's the difference.

Poverty and disadvantage correlate more closely than race and disadvantage do. To focus on race rather than poverty has a clear agenda: to reinforce racial divisions.

Physical science isn't normative, social science is. That's why is legit to ask different questions in each case.

It's plain that the typical Gawker editor/commenter always tries to demonize poor white people by painting them with the same brush as very wealthy, often ruthless, white people. You will be mocked for suggesting that you too suffer—because you don't exist in their minds as a person, but as an abstraction. It's a very…

Get over yourself.

Is that how you usually completely disregard someone's existence and opinion? By responding to their comments?

The problem isn't that Li'l Kim is passé, and therefore shouldn't be taking on Minaj. The problem is that all rap beefs are pathetic displays of self-hatred.

Way to dismiss a thoughtful attempt to add to a conversation. Well done.

I feel bad for all those Gawker commenters who were robbed of the "if only the races had been reversed" argument by this verdict. A painful day for them indeed.

The BBC covered up the Jimmy Savile child-rape scandal for decades. I guess that "Ombudsman" guy isn't as terrifying a figure in reality as he is in your dreams.

Insulting? To whom?

Deliberately obfuscation, not just a failure to be "very clear."

I bet they will. Here today, Ghana tomorrow.