They’re in Estonia at the moment.

I don’t know if the F-35 can do this or not, or if it’s limited to only the inboard pylons (which would carry external tanks). If the airbattle space and threat conditions are such that I can launch sorties without the need for LO (ie - a permissive environment such as Afghanistan, or peacetime domestic airspace…

TheAviationist reported this story yesterday with photos.
Second Aviationist article from yesterday.

Keep an eye on af.mil, they’ll probably post higher res pix soon.

Any external pods would incur a drag penalty, reducing range/endurance and hindering agility.

They’ve been doing that for years now. Increases the duration on station with the added benefit of intentionally screwing up the plane’s RCS for prying eyes.

Short answer: A lot.

F-22s, when delivered to the squadrons, they were delivered with a “Bill of Sale” of sorts that listed the final cost of that aircraft.

Early production F-22s ran an average of $130M per copy. By the time the last ones were picked up from the factory, the price per Raptor was down to $101M per…

If it does the mission who cares how old it is.

Because the Coast Guard can’t take the budget hit.

MQ-1s operate on an unencrypted datalink. And continuing to operate them takes away bandwidth from other platforms such as the MQ-9.

The Navy or Marine Corps could re purpose the MQ-1s to operate from supercarriers and amphibious assault flattops, which would offer a persistent information surveillance and reconnaissance platform with long endurance at low cost.

The 160th had a brand-new (“doesn’t even have sandwich stains on the seats”) MH-60M at the Army Aviation Association of America’s annual convention in Nashville about 2-3 months back and they were letting anyone check out the cabin and cockpit. They even had a monitor hooked up to the FLIR so you could see what it saw.

…

Barksdale AFB, May 1992. The Russian planes were visting as part of an exchange program proposed by then-Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Merrill A. McPeak. March 1992, two B-52s, a KC-10 and their crews visited Dyagilevo AB, Russia

He’s talking about the -15s and -16s.

F-16s and F-15Es have been performing that mission since the first Gulf War and the F-35A will pick it up as it gets fielded to active units. We currently have more A-10s (253 according to this chart) than we have Air-Superiority-Only F-15Cs (197).

the assembly line could be ramped up

losing ground forces because the costs of losing such an aircraft, too high to risk.

But the A-10 never has had support of the upper fast mover crowd

Fraction of the price?

Gap filler?
The F-15SE isn’t in production. It doesn’t have the fuel or weapons capacity of the F-15E (or SA for that matter). And simply canting the fins outward doesn’t give it LO. It’s still got the same boxy intakes, the same fuselage design, the same disco-ball airframe.
F-35A is already in production, with IOC…

As I already said - Someone has to put out some actual facts. If you want to hear only what you want to hear, that’s your circus, not mine.