Were they hooking up? Or was she lusting after him and thought being Team Dude would put her in his good graces?

She was sleeping with him, or wanted to be. I’m sorry.

Respectfully disagree; the friend knows what she did. Laying out how somebody fucked up is good when the ex-friend has their head firmly up their ass, but here, BowlofCherries is probably best off just blocking this woman’s email and moving on. Ex-friend here is just looking to feel like a good person for not writing…

I feel like you got off easy there. 

I DO NOT GET THIS. What kind of compartmentalizing asshole just “forgets” a long term serious relationship? And he wasn’t down for physical adultery, he clearly simply enjoyed having you on the string! ASSHOLE!

About ten years ago, I had this friend Steve. He’d been through some shit. We got very close. We once spent an entire weekend together except for spending the night. Our offices were next door to each other so we went to lunch and happy hour constantly. We were also on G chat during the business day. In addition to…

She was at least ‘on trend’ for the most part in the 80s, and once they were divorced she pushed the envelope at least some.

In the previous post I read about this ‘feud’, it seems this writer has a lot of time to just hate on Markle and sees rage any time The Duchess does anything. It seems what’s her face writer in a long post claimed that Megan was trying to be the center of attention and was mad at the baby for upstaging her and also…

I’m American but also a UK citizen (plus the citizen of two other commonwealth countries) and I can confirm that it’s all absurd. Anyone who points to history or tradition for the reason to continue anything needs to remember that history and tradition are pretty much the defence for all forms of bullshit.

There is always something about 70's Babs that I have always found hot and sexy.  Chuck?  Not so much.  

Which is interesting. In 16 when HRC was running for president, I knew people that stated that they wouldn’t vote for her. When I would ask why, they would say that she’s done things. What things I would ask. occasionally it was Benghazi, but overwhelmingly it was from her time as a first lady. The same people that…

I also love that people fawn over Kate for her ‘daring’ and ‘fashionable’ clothing.

And what the fuck does that word even mean in this case?

“A bit dim,” I think she said.

I meant partisan. Like no one will argue that children shouldn’t go hungry or they shouldn’t be taught to read. (Opponents will just quietly cut funding for such initiatives.) You can’t overly oppose those issues like abortion or climate change or foreign aid.

You had me until ““soft” pet issues like childcare or reading or hunger.” These aren’t soft issues, 20% of all children in America live below the poverty line, which is $17k for a family of 2. Similarly 1 in 4 kids grow up not knowing how to read. 85% of all juveniles who interface with the justice system are…

The criticism of being “unmaternal” by that goofball writer makes me assume she’s never tried to read to a small child before. In my experience, you either get spooky focus or squirmy book tossing. Depending on the baby, both are equally likely, and my unscientific data suggests that it has absolutely nothing to do…

the pageantry is silly, but the whole UK parliament is built on royal prerogative and to change that would mean that lots of other things could be changed on the fly. So I don’t know, the Queen shows a lot of respect for that and I think she deserves some respect in return.

Ordained by God. Don’t forget that they all believe they were ordained by God to live in wealth thanks to taxing the public.

I eyeroll Kate’s popularity because she’s the epitome of the “ideal” woman: white, non-threatening, no complaints, no opinions, no controversy, sticking to the pre-approved talking points, never showing off intelligence, never speaking up, always being nice, never going off script, always compliant with what TPTB ask,…