Does it get better later? Because I really don't like the minute long missions that don't seem to gel well together. I only got like 2 hours in, where you fight the bullshit tank.
Does it get better later? Because I really don't like the minute long missions that don't seem to gel well together. I only got like 2 hours in, where you fight the bullshit tank.
The more you feed them, the more they come. I suggest dismissing the next reply and ignoring the dude.
No one is making you eat there, or in this case, buy the game.
I mean, can't you beat MGS1 in under an hour with the best ranking if you skip all the cutscenes?
lol, dat face
Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster | PS3/Vita
Or maybe you should step off to some other thread son, because I've probably played over a thousand games. Lost Odyssey kind of sucked too, I didn't bother finishing it.
Heathen
The hype is different when your favorite game of all time gets a shiny rebirth with all the features that you never got to experience.
It did 9 months ago when this comment was posted.
Good job missing the entire point of the post, particularly the part where I specifically noted that graphics do not affect a game's ability to be awesome.
This looks fantastic
Hell, I'm too terrified to go to the doctor ever since I got charged 5000 dollars for an allergy test.
Lol, I do that too
I thought Skyrim was ugly too, all 3D Bethesda games have been ugly.
Actually, I played Mass Effect on release day, and three times in a row to boot.
Shit I love gaudy. I want my PC to look like a laser light show.
Okay, now see, THAT is a valid complaint.
This wasn't a matter of artistic direction. I'm not saying that the game had bad aesthetics, I'm saying, on a purely technical level, the games were ugly. I can appreciate a beautiful space view with a saturated lens flare as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean that the rocks and structures and such in front…