Pretty much. Although there is a distinction between opposing a same sex marriage bill because it would be “too divisive” and claiming to oppose same sex marriage itself, it is a very small distinction.
Pretty much. Although there is a distinction between opposing a same sex marriage bill because it would be “too divisive” and claiming to oppose same sex marriage itself, it is a very small distinction.
Not evil. But a bit of a coward on LGBT issues, in that he disowned his previous support of the community when it looked like a liability in his first presidential campaign.
Came here to say this. Also, hatchback sedan would be a unique body style in the U.S. market.
Have driven. Would buy. (If I needed a truck, which I don’t.)
Quindrants? Pentagrants?
We tried to get Meryl Streep, but we couldn’t afford her.
Not Hillary, but at least someone is standing up to DWS.
Tim Canova is taking on DWS in the primary.
Primary DWS!
Yes, you could argue that, as a thought experiment, but “human error” in the context of a car crash generally implies error on the part of some human in driving or directing the vehicles involved.
Well, at least it’s not a Tdi.
Blerry?
Coulter is totally a transsomethingorother.
No. Apparently the solution is public consumption.
I’m intrigued that they’re all wearing camo. Shouldn’t the military develop a special camo for office interiors?
A failure of the “PUNCH IT!” algorithm?
Mechanical catastrophe unrelated to neglected maintenance? For example, a metallurgical flaw causes a tie rod to break with a resulting loss of steering control?
Listen, I’m glad you’ve been lucky so far, but rather than knocking on wood, can you site a credible source beyond your own opinion that travelling half a second behind another car is safe?
I really doubt your insurance company would agree. Why don’t you ask them? Or a traffic cop?