Tohuwabohu
Tohuwabohu
Tohuwabohu

there are none because there is nothing to be pro-GG about

“To even question feminism right now gets you labeled as a bigot” Why is that so surprising? You say it like there’s a blurry line. Merriam Webster Dictionary defines feminism as

The irony of being “anti-censorship” yet a group that talks over panelists trying to discuss a particular topic.

“Don’t push feminism on your reader (push equality!)“

If only most of the tweets about GamerGate did not target women in the gaming industry. The majority of tweets from September and October focused on female developers and a small number of female writers rather than journalists as a whole.

The major, glaring issues with their stated case is how absurdly wrong it is.

Being against censorship is great. I am against censorship. Are these people focusing their criticism on Australia or Japan or other national bodies that literally censor games? Judging by a quick perusal of their site and topics, not at all.

It’s about the ethics in gaming journalism.

Last time I visited KiA to see what they were talking about now, the entire front page was occupied with threads about the pathology of the SJW. It was like a phrenologists’ convention. The ethics notion was proven wrong months ago, when it became clear they did not want to fight blatant ethical breaches by the

It also has to be brought up that it isn’t that some assholes took up the GG flag and ran with it so much as it is those assholes started the movement. Some very reasonable people have tried to take the GG flag away and use it to spark rational debate and discussion, but the fact of the matter is that GG began as a

If GamerGate were actually about ethics in journalism, they would not be actively trying to destroy Kotaku — a site that refuses press junkets, regularly pisses off game publishers through aggressive journalism, and is just about as transparent as any gaming site can be — they’d be going after Metacritic and exclusive

Today I learned that being a feminist was unethical...

Welcome to Canada.

While panelists can choose to not answer a question, the problem here is (as the GGers even admitted) their goal wasn’t to have a back and forth with the panel, but rather to disrupt it with a line of derailing questions. So choosing to not answer questions would’ve been used as fuel against the panel just as much as

Why wouldn’t there be? There are always members of oppressed minorities who side with their oppressors. Black and gay republicans, for example.

It’s funny how GG is trying to spin it as “different political opinions are banned!” or “Leftists kick girl gamers out! Misogyny!”

There are female MRAs? I don’t get it.

So just going off the headline, I wasn’t aware that people were concerned with video games causing sexism, as much as how much sexism is in video games.

Little known (possibly?) Fact: Vaan is the direct result of SquareEnix forcing onto Yasumi Matsuno (the director of FF Tactics, Vagrant Story and of course FF XII) a character that their metrics said would resonate with their target demographic. He was not at all in any way originally planned to be in the game,

The only way he could be writing objective reviews is if every single statement regarding the game is an evidence-based fact about the game. If his goal is to actually be objective then he cannot say “I like the game” or “You should try this game” or anything of the sort.