Good stuff. I love how SonicFox legitimately has fun at these competitions. I don’t think I’ve ever seen him (Them? The article mentioned non-binary preferences...) get angry or rage quit.
Good stuff. I love how SonicFox legitimately has fun at these competitions. I don’t think I’ve ever seen him (Them? The article mentioned non-binary preferences...) get angry or rage quit.
My wife and I don’t wear our shoes into the house. It’s a great way to mess up the floors.
Ha! This is an incredibly stupid take.
This is the adorable, awesome kind of news I need to get my Monday started off on the right foot.
The author is warning readers about an unethical business practice. He’s not here to pass moral judgement on people who made poor purchasing decisions.
Oh no! Your 6 year old was upset by the people who told her the truth about what she is about to see!
I mean, it’s basically hentai.
I have a friend who has over 5000 hours logged into Skyrim.
Obligatory:
Beltorchika is holding his right arm and he can’t extend it enough to reach out for a handshake.
Good post. Everyone forgets that the first group of people that the rapacious Baby Boomers fucked over were their own children.
The show is also about everyone else around Saitama as much as it is about him. He actually doesn’t get much more screen time in the second season than any of the other characters that have been introduced. He is often used to hang a lampshade on how absurd a character or situation is.
Oh god my heart. I used to love watching her play before she left the scene (understandably so).
Eh, I’m not buying the “reliability” line at all. Teslas have proven to be very reliable when they don’t come off the line with manufacturing issues — a problem that has dramatically lessened in recent times and which Tesla has always scrambled to fix in an attempt to keep their reputation.
Beastmaster Rangers are a perfectly functioning archetype. The animal companion is clunky in combat but is still useful.
Ugh. You are making an apples or oranges comparison.
Forgive me for my attempt at reasonable discourse.
He didn’t advocate violence, he warned against it. It was a “Those who make peaceful change impossible instead make violent revolution inevitable” warning, though not in those exact words. It did encourage violent revolution by the oppressed proletariat to throw off the chains of their oppression, but it most…
Oh boy. I don’t know how exactly to unpack that.
Actually, it wasn't. But it should be studied as well, on account of how influential the author was.