I didn't. But even if someone had: he didn't run commercials claiming that gay people are 'coming for your children.' That $1000 Eich spent paid for one of those commercials.

For some reason I thought those creams were to lighten dark spots due to acne scarring or sun spots. Kind of to even skin tone out to it's original color.

He didn't get fired because of his personal beliefs. He got fired because he contributed to a hateful discriminatory campaign designed to strip people of their legal marriages, and then tried to be the public face of a company that prides itself on equality.

Yes, they support people in love getting married regardless if they're straight or gay. And also, we don't talk of 'tolerance' of gay or lesbians, we talk of acceptance. There's nothing to tolerate.

You mean how we don't like people that discriminate? Yeah, I'm pretty intolerant of those that would take rights away from others, you would be correct.

I love how conservatives are too dumb to understand what "tolerance" means.

this is a man who is working to stop me from getting married and paid for commercials that imply I'm a pedophile. That sounds like someone who is out to get me. The work he did isn't just a political dispute, it's a direct attack on me. Why would I tolerate it? It's like saying I should tolerate a punch in the face.

Yes, liberals are intolerant of intolerance. Next.

I read them all and I don't see misandry. That's why I asked for a quote. Even when I replace the words, I don't see misogyny. Some mothers are shit at parenting and so are some fathers. Having only a father is better than having a father and a shitty/deadbeat mother. Those are true statements. The only way to see…

I don't have any hate toward man what so Ever

I admit I take considerable enjoyment in watching them froth at the mouth at the idea that there are women out there who don't want or need them.

Not having a good dad sucks. It can be much better, however, than having a dad that wasn't ready for children, that only stuck with the mom because of the child, or that doesn't have a healthy relationship with the mother. In particular, I know a few people who were raised by parents whose relationship was unhealthy:…

That sounds like an absurd postulate. If she thinks of the kid's needs first, the kid never comes into existence? And that's better for... whom? Literally nobody - because the person for whose benefit it was done does not exist. So it's better for nobody. This argument fails basic logic...

I guess my wife and I are awful people. We should give our son up for adoption to a heterosexual couple.

Over the course of my life I have had THREE. Genetic and twice adopted. Guess how many I have in my life right now? Go ahead. Guess. You know what I would have missed having none from the get go? Drug addiction, gambling addiction, sexual abuse, mental/emotional abuse, a litter of dead puppies, racism, sexism,…

You might be projecting here. Gella hasn't said anything about her status regarding kids at all. And there are plenty of kids who will tell you that their father sucked and you're the lucky one. Everyone's situation is different.

I am not being selfish here, I am trying to understand, what if right man would never come along, then what???

Let me try one...

I think you're all missing the bigger picture here. It's probable that all of that creativity wasn't his, but was one of the mice sitting under his hat the whole time.

And yet the answer is and has been: If you lose control of your animal and it leaves your property call FUCKING ANIMAL CONTROL if it could pose a danger to others.