I think 3-1's point was that someone who is visibly carrying a weapon is probably going to receive significantly less sexual harassment than someone who isn't, not that they'd shoot innocent people.

How do children "openly flaunt sexuality" anyway? And if a child is doing that, gay or straight, shouldn't you call the police cause it is illegal?

Don't waste your time. That lot are utterly incapable of differentiating between objectification in the limited "Oh hey she's got a nice ass" and giving a bit of a look sense, and the kind objectification represented by someone going out of their way to act like a woman consists of legs, ass and tits all tied…

I don't think I'm owed shit, but any man who would step in and try to put a stop to a sexual assault in progress will have certainly revealed himself to be a better person than you, you smug fuck.

There's a viewpoint in the MRA community that if an MRA is on a rape jury, no matter what, he should vote for acquittal. Because false accusations, which they believe is pretty much the case in every rape——claimed by women, that is.

There is really no point in arguing with that dude. I know sometimes we can't resist the urge, but they will just continue to scream "personal responsibility" like a 5-year-old throwing a tantrum. I don't think there is any reasoning with people who think like him because they fail to see it's everyone's "personal…

By the way, saying 'it is nice when people do such-and-such' doesn't imply that you think that you're owed it.

But now that you know that the campaign included women you must agree that your whole white knight thing was a little overwrought.

Exactly. Because if there's any women on the planet that are sensitive flowers, it's New Yorkers who are likely to be of Italian heritage.

They have a point. If a player gets excited and accidentally swears in front of a lady, they'll have to suspend the game when she faints to run and get smelling salts.

All I'm hearing is "wah wah wah the feminists are winning, and I'm going to be dead soon."

My three year old niece would love to wear a temporary tattoo- any temporary tattoo. If your kid is old enough to object than they're probably old enough to tell people about their allergy themselves. And your bit about pre-1990s parents makes no damn sense. I cast no aspersions on any parents in my post. If you don't…

I thought the Senate Bill had the 20 week ban in the text right up until Wendy Davis's filibuster? They have started over again in the House.

I just tweeted a Texas Tribune writer on this, she says ban is still in.

Yeah! Fuck them for coming up with something new that kids might actually want to wear and get excited about. And fuck those parents for giving a shit.

Does anyone know what's up with all these allergies lately?

First, let's not allergy blame here. If some jerk kid makes fun of someone for having an allergy tattoo, that kid is a jerk. The poor allergy kid isn't a nerd!

Good call. Kids are at their most understanding in middle school.

how amused am I that there's already two commentors in the grey (men both, natch) presumably clutching their weapon of choice while explaining that it's not the same, no not at all.

Great. With all the other crap I have to be insecure about, now I have to worry my hooha doesn't have a high enough caliber to intimidate Republicans.