Thornus267
Thornus267
Thornus267

There’s no precedent yet, AFAIK. The case is pending before the trial court. A stay was issued pending the decision in a case involving McGahn, and I think the McGahn case will hinge partially on the Mazars decision? I’m not sure there.

That law wasn’t at issue today. The Mazars case dealt with Congress subpoenaing records from Trump’s accounting firm and Trump interceding to quash the subpoena. The case where Mnuchin refused to hand over the returns is currently at the District Court level and was stayed in May. SCOTUS, rightfully, limits itself to

Scott Adams went full MAGAt in 2015 or 2016.

She’s up for election to keep her appointed seat in a jungle primary special election in November. She’s being attacked from the right by Doug Collins, a dyed in the wool Trumpist. MAGAts aren’t going to vote for her; they’re going to support Collins. Three major Dems are running for the seat too, and they’ll need to

If the older woman is into that, who am I to kinkshame?

Only the good die young. Only the evil seem to live forever.

“The argument over the 1894 flag has become as divisive as the flag itself and it’s time to end it. If they send me a bill this weekend, I will sign it”

TwinGalaxies doesn’t allow emulators, and the evidence that it was emulated is pretty clear. I doubt they reinstate. Guinness reinstating was just a way to cheaply settle lawsuits over something that doesn’t actually matter to them.

Late April is already Confederate Memorial Day in Georgia.

Gorsuch, had he been nominated under normal circumstances, would have been a relatively uncontroversial pick for a Republican president under the current partisan climate. But when you add in Garland debacle and then the way Trump won the presidency, it put him even more in the spotlight.

At least with respect to Powell, he was public with his voting for Hillary in 2016 and Obama in (at least) 2012. He’s always been more reserved, so speaking out publicly all the time against Trump is just outside of his nature. But, at least for him, he has been consistent on his distaste for Trump.

It was better than the other tone deaf tweet they considered “Sonic Sez - Gotta go fash.”

Regarding #2, because if they don’t take it, Trump lies and says he had a good conversation, doesn’t even mention attempting to call, or just calls them nasty people who didn’t treat him right when he was trying to express his condolences. With the first, the family says he lied and people pass it off as Trump lying

My father used to paint houses in the summer while off for the summer from teaching. One gated community refused to allow any work or delivery vehicles inside of it at all. His normal pickup truck was considered a work vehicle. Every delivery person, maintenance worker, etc. had to park outside the gate then lug the

Where does this “first president to speak against his successor” lie come from? I’m willing to bet Carter (rightfully) did it. Teddy Roosevelt DEFINITELY did it - hell, he ran against his successor (Taft) in 1912.

“Pretty’s prison record shows that she’s committed only three rules infractions in the 42 years that she’s been in prison.”

We should also look at the Democratic members of the HELP Committee too, to see who might ask good questions.

Patriots should’ve drafted Rodrigo Blankenship instead.

You clearly don’t understand what troll and kaizo makers can do then.

Your empty “fire” analogy aside, there is a question of whether the expulsion is allowed under current 1st Amendment jurisprudence. Schools are given more leeway to curtail otherwise protected speech. A quick and dirty thread on it from a strong First Amendment proponent: