Well trolled.

Ermmm, you're flat out wrong.

Why did she push-off her career with a website called "Sexyvideogameland.com" if she didn't want to be objectified.

I'm not the one blinded by prejudice.

Now you're just being intentionally thick.

You're doing the opposite of the sensible thing, when a boundary pusher is pushing, subtlety allows them to do what they want.

As a man I have to agree.

Once a man's essentially been told "You're getting some tonight" which is the message she explicitly communicated in the taxi, subtlety is gone as far as he's concerned.

Women are not cats!

Yea, this is just false equivalency.

Isn't that false equivalency?

nomnomnom.

It was drummed into me I'd need to be able to provide.

Is that not worse, seeing as you're not only degrading them to objects but shaming them for not fitting beauty stereotypes?

"False equivalency"

Well then you need to be more inclusive and stop judging purely based on your heteronormative western idealised perception of beauty.

"Yada yada yada.

Actually I'm in favour of the article.

Ermmm no they're not. Google suffrage, educate yourself, then come back and try to educated others.

While it's probably not down to direct sexism in the industries, there's a good argument to suggest that girls aren't being raised with those potential career paths ever suggested or encouraged by their parents.