I'm more than a little embarrassed to say it took me three guesses to get the song reference (first two were NIB and Black Sabbath). More proof I'm getting old...

Exactly. Not only can children not fend off potential abductors, but most of them don't fully know enough to not go off willingly with a stranger who is charming and convincing enough and is saying their parent sent them to get them or something like that. The fact that stranger abductions are very rare isn't a reason…

Haha, go for it and shoot me a link when it's done! :)

That's the thing—I'd like to have a child in the next few years, but then I stress about money (because kids need braces someday, right?) and the total life change (I like my life; it's hard to give that up for something that's supposed to be satisfying but is a total unknown). Somehow I feel like an overwhelming…

Can someone explain to me what it feels like to feel your "biological clock ticking?" I'm 30 and I'd like to have kids at some point, but I have no idea what this biological urge is supposed to be. I'm also at the point where other people around my age mention things like "baby fever" and my face just goes ????

Yup. I broke things off with my fiance on account of being gay. Doesn't mean I was lying to him or never loved him, just means it took me a little while to realise that no, it isn't actually the case that I'm bisexual and just having temporary difficulties with wanting sex with the guy.

Amen, preach, high five, and testify.

What days were those?

so it would be easier for you to accept that your husband lied to you for the entire time you were married , never loved you in the first place, that you were just something to hide behind?

Hey now, he could be bisexual...in which case you lost the competition so gay-husband would be more of an ego save.

Or only allow posting of gifs if you have an account AND you have posted XX number (20?) posts. This will give you some lead-time for those burner accounts, and at the same time make it a total pain in the ass for the idiots, but without taking away too much of the fun. I think that's fair?

Or only allow posting of gifs if you have an account AND you have posted XX number (20?) posts. This will give you some lead-time for those burner accounts, and at the same time make it a total pain in the ass for the idiots, but without taking away too much of the fun. I think that's fair?

See this is the kind of gross misunderstanding of how the human body works that you get when you cut funding to sex ed.

So then they'll post jpgs.

A number of reasons, including it being easy to circumvent, but I believe it's tied into the idea of having burners in the first place. It's not anonymous if their IP is being tracked.

Or at least make it so burner accounts can only post text, no gifs or links. Sure they'll still troll, but not as obscenely.

Banning IPs isnt the perfect solution being presented. Every time your router reboots and at other times, it goes to your internet provider and grabs a new IP. What if one day you wake up and no Jezebel for you because some troll had that IP last? Also Mr troll can jump onto neighbors wifi, coffee house wifi or…

I think banning gifs is the wrong precedent to set and allows Gawker to ignore the problem instead of doing what it takes to stop it.

I love my gifs, but I could forgo them if it was the best solution...