Skyrim or New Vegas?

Correct. I imagine this Trilogy will be 18 discs, as well. Maybe Wii U will get it eventually but in the meantime, I'd be willing to bet you cannot import an xbox save into Wii U console.

So true. I really don't get how those losers can just complain and complain and complain, yet still play the game every single day. Obviously, I'm exaggerating a bit, but it's more true for Diablo 3 and a few other Blizzard games than non-Blizzard games.

My dad drove one of these well over 300k miles. Of course my mother was not a big fan, but it's hard to argue with the high mpg and low maintenance costs.

Probably. TGUSA is awful.

Guaranteed that whoever is behind this did not know the honor or symbolism behind the war bonnet. This was created by a fashion designer, after all, not a history professor.

They USED to be a fantastic developer. Unfortunately, it hasn't been that way for a few years. ME3 was good, but given how awesome the first two games were, still a letdown in my [and many others'] opinions.

This. SK made so many bad decisions with that game, they honestly deserve to go down.

I think you're right. In order to get a clear shot of the Milky Way, you would need a long exposure time, which I am fairly certain would not capture the meteor clearly, as it would only appear for a fraction of the time the lens was open.

That said, it's nice to see an article with some length to it.

Collectors.

Anyone willing to drop serious money on it would be doing their homework first. If there were any question as to the authenticity of the game, they would call in an expert or ask for a legitimate source to verify the game.

Yeah, I mean this is pretty much a scam to get clicks. This is a video card glitch and falsely advertised in the title. Worth crying about? No.

Right, I have basically the exact same history with SC. Played SC2 for a month or so when it launched and haven't really looked back. Maybe if I had friends who were regularly playing it, it would be different, but it's an intense game. When I did play, I was competitive - what's the point if you're not? So, when…

Sure, some maps are relatively easier than others, but that's really only a small part of it. The complexity of the game is what's hard to learn. Maybe I'm just getting old. :)

Yeah, I understand that the two do not always mean opposing things and agree with you that Blizzard is great at 'easy to learn, a lifetime to master', but SC2 is already quite good at slowly introducing new players to the units and mechanics of the game. The problem isn't that they need more tutorials or slower…

Oh Bill, we miss ya.

HAH! /Burrrrrrrn.

Agree with you 100%. There's, honestly, no real way to make SC 'casual accessible' while retaining the complexity and strategy that the game is.

Yes, this is my choice as well. I haven't played it yet, but from what I've seen, they are shooting to be the default answer to this very question.