TheLoneGunman
TheLoneGunman
TheLoneGunman

Of course it is - you forgot, this is PATRICIA.

Yuna, Lulu, and Shiva: Report to my dunge.... I mean, bedchamber, at once. Bring the whipped cream and soundproofing equipment....

Congratulations, Internet. You made me post here again.

Not nearly as widespread as they are now, and not nearly as reliable.

Save the Steinhem rhetoric.

They keep it alive because sexuality has been adopted as a wholesale commodity, peddled by modern women for money and power, and when all you can get are table scraps, that's what you take.

So you deny any kind of instinctual need for sexual contact with a woman for a heterosexual male human?

I don't think there is - but the waiter isn't teasing basic instincts. He's just bringing stuff out from the kitchen.

I don't. But I still consider it extortion.

Oh yes, because teasing evolutionary drives of men so that they become drunk with hormones, and taking their money, is such a very noble profession.

No, because objecting to state imposition of a thing does not automatically make one opposed to said thing.

And here you prove that you completely misunderstand his point.

The Last Remnant was pretty darn good, as was Cross Edge.

Feminists don't understand biology, they only understand Marxism.

Looks like it's gettin' all Mark 13:25 up in Russia there...

Frédéric Bastiat provides my answer.

It's a broader sociological problem. We're in the welfare mess that we're in right now because of some very unwise, very large shifts in family structure.

IF you ask the feminists: