I agree with you. And mind you, i'm not arguing for/against Stewart/Zimmerman. My case is more with how the public, especially on this site, seems to respond to these things. I'm trying to establish a base, so that I can actually compare the reactions.

Are you kidding me? The only difference you just brought up is the fact that the crimes took place in different settings. Everything else is still valid.

1. Trayvon may or may not have confronted Zimmerman. No one knows. but the living guy says he was "attacked" which would be right in line with your assumption that he "was trying to prove how macho we was."

2. Stewart was armed, a car is a weapon. Instead of a dark ally (which this wasn't even the case with Trayvon),…

Just an observation. This is pretty much the exact same debate as the Trayvon/Zimmerman thing. Virtually the exact same situation, but without "race" included.

Still no mention of Sir Purr...

This uhh... Yeah, this was your photo right here.

Uh Yeah. We're the richest nation in the world and all our athletes are doped up. So if another country is beating us, they must obviously be on the turbo drugs.

Or if you're comparing this to Vince Young. That amount will carry him for almost 1 full year.

Watch him stare down the cat after he pays his dues. He knows exactly what he's doing.

Inferno? Is that a Fire Tornado, or do I play too many video games?

Fuck the high road

"Based on a true story."

I really don't understand the big deal. He seems like my kind of guy.

What's The Matter With CrossFit?

Giggity

I also don't see any nutrition facts. Ignorant bliss is good bliss.

Eh. I thought France had a pretty easy world cup. They folded to the first real challenger (who ended up winning the world cup.)

I'm in the "please for the love of humanity, don't have kids unless you've thought about it thoroughly" camp.

Male: Check
Job: Check
White: Check

Starship troopers? Starship troopers. Well done