Apparently nobody really listened to all the #metoo stories, because women (and men too) already explained over and over and over and over again why they didn’t report it.
Apparently nobody really listened to all the #metoo stories, because women (and men too) already explained over and over and over and over again why they didn’t report it.
Because I got away, I convinced myself there was nothing to report. I convinced myself that because it was attempted rape, not completed, no one would care. I didn’t tell anyone for 4 years and even then I played it off as not a big deal. We tell ourselves all kinds of things so that we don’t have to be a victim. I…
Uh, that’s completely ridiculous. You clearly know very little about Jane Fonda.
So five closed and 3 we’re Trump owned? Do I have that right? Let’s look at the actual timeline.
The man filed bankruptcy multiple times selling football, Manhattan property, steak and casinos to Americans. He’s one of the most incompetent business people in history.
That’s not what she’s saying.
Do you know why Trump’s casinos failed? Nothing to do with the economy, it was all in the financing.
God, fuck this fucking guy so fucking hard.
They use it to fill in the down time between crooked investigations of Trump so they have an excuse for why they’re not investigating Hillary.
The same FBI he bashes as corrupt and incompetent. Does he not get irony, or do his followers not? Or both?
I think it’s more a response to the overwrought hand-wringing about “HOWWWW WILL HE FEED HIS FAMILY IF HES NOT ALLOWED TO WORK??!!” bs that’s been trotted out (LOOKING AT YOU, MICHAEL IAN BLACK). Oh boo friggetty hoo, you cant get paid $25,000 to do a night of standup work anymore. Go feed your family the way so…
Trump was accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
Juanita Broaddrick waited 20 years to accuse Clinton of rape, and there was no police report, so we shouldn’t believe her either, right?
And....what happened to it being wrong to drag a man’s name through the mud with no evidence?
When it gets down to it, Starbucks might not even hire a sexual harasser anyway.
All these victims of Catholic priests are obviously lying, too. Why wouldn’t they or their parents report it if it really happened?!?!
Did Fox News identify the alternative “suspect?” If so, HOW THE FUCK DOES THAT GET PAST LEGAL???
bonus points for using trans-dimensional which most conservatives will assume is a dimension full of trans people
I hope there's a lawsuit. Paging Michael Avenatti!
I’ll admit, I thought “demonic possession” was going to be the next excuse. I didn’t see “it was his doppleganger” coming.