How is electronically attacking a surveillance plane in international airspace not an aggressive act of war?
How is electronically attacking a surveillance plane in international airspace not an aggressive act of war?
“Thrown off” as if to imply that they aren’t real jobs that don’t help real people.
(NSFW)
wait it's not Saturday?
wait it's not Saturday?
If you have any product that specifically has for Men on it, you're most likely a moron.
More intellectual dishonesty or pure ignorance out of you. You know damn well that males respond to visual stimulus more readily than women. There has been extensive research into how the opposites prioritize each other. And more simply, there are published porn site statistics posted on Gawker pretty regularly.
I'm actually taking a second here to be amazed at you actually calling it a women's rights issue. A really misguided and/or shameless thing to say.
ugh pathetic little white knight missing the point entirely.
Finally, not a Jesus Diaz article.
I hope the guy reads this and dumps that infantile fascist he's dating.
lol broads complaining about what other broads are wearing.
This has never happened.
My guess is this is just misdirection, making potential adversaries fearful of actual fish that appear on sonar. There are more efficient ways to propel an underwater drone, and having it appear like food to sharks just lacks all common sense.
I tried to answer in a way that would get me an economy car / hybrid...
Your analogy wasn't cunty enough.
What? The Apple cultists favor yet another Apple branded product? I'm shocked.