TeamRyan
TeamRyan
TeamRyan

Also, when I saw this you had exactly 108 stars, so +1 obscure JRPG meta-reference

“the conflict was forced” is literally the plot of the movie

random contrived coincidence

Fair point. Whilst I don’t agree with your Girl with the Dragon Tattoo comparison (I loved the original, found the American version rather meh) it it can happen, and does happen, where an adaptation can be better. Off the top of my head (and I’ve read/seen the originals) examples are The Departed, The Shining, Blade

A reporter has no name.

I find Tidus to be a weak and uninspiring character, it doesn’t stop FFX from being well received.

Ill comment on the subjectivity. Knack was kinda boring and kill zone will never be a franchise that gets people excited...though it looks great. 1886 was a major disappointment. As a guy who likes Sony, their first party stuff has been weak and if it wasn’t for their 1080p advantage i dont see how they could be

Subject at hand was the original commenter wanted MS to talk more about exclusive games at this years E3. MS and Sony will be doing that but Nintendo clearly will not be.

Half of those games aren't out or are remasters

It was probably extra cool for both of them since they actually knew each other and had worked together beforehand.

If Conan O’Brien just spin off “Clueless Gamer” as its own show, I would not be unhappy.

No, Goblin has lots of motivation.

The thing I love most about this win is it shows how dangerous a clinical, technically sound striker can be against a grappler.

Or, couldn’t Disney just bully a transfer of The Incredibles into the Marvel Universe? They’re essentially the FF, and that means they could bring along Edna Mode! Total. Win.

I enjoyed my Titan, but what will get my wallet open is when they make a warlock complete with a Heart of the Praxic Fire.

That’s a poor excuse for a game. I shouldn’t have to check the forums just to figure out how to play the game.

Except that the extent of the tutorials in Dark Souls covers only the basic controls.

Explanation # 1: He's legitimately an okay guy and is accurately representing himself here.

Whether you believe it or not... it was a well-written response with at least a few explanations.