Except that they probably didn’t know it was a minor when they sued them. Chances are good that all that was available was a legal name in the webserver and contact information. Generally speaking, the only way to find out more information in a situation like this is to file a lawsuit, and Epic would have been a…

Epic sued these guys because they continued to update their software to bypass anti-cheat hacks and they deliberately advertised and sold them online. To be clear, these guys weren’t regular old cheat users, they were making and updating the cheat software that others were using and deliberately flaunted the fact that…

Yep. Here’s the original article on the lawsuit:

In which case they simply sue her instead for her child’s actions.

The kid is the one that made the hacking programs. He’s the one that was distributing them. They aren’t suing individual cheaters, they’re suing the people that distributed those cheats.

You may want to have a look at this first:

Ahem, actually not. It’s legal to sue minors in most states if they enter into a contract, and Delaware does not set a cap on the damages that can be passed on to the parents. Mommy may be paying a big bill here.

It’s more that if someone is sending you threatening direct messages, if you block them you can no longer see those messages. Thus, take screenshots of said messages and/or report them to Twitter before you block them.

You’re doing it right then:

I believe you just made it less of a joke and more of an insult, so I think it kinda works either way.

Somewhere around 16, depending on your local taxes and assuming you buy new.

Unfortunately, at least one of them did:

I think he was holding it up as an example of something aimed at children by a large corporation, not as a shining example of government efficiency.

First off, go play X-COM right now you git, though it is best on PC; it’s easily the best turn-based strategy game of the past decade. Secondly, I’ll say this: Syndicate (2012) was actually good. It got a lot of shit from people who didn’t like that it was using a franchise they liked, but as someone who didn’t play…

I’m curious to see what the ESA does now. With regulators closing in, what sort of board will they create? Last time they created the ESRB to rate video games’ content for parental information, will they just add loot box ratings to games too? Rated “M” for “Mature” and “G” for “Gambling”?

but we don’t anymore is his point.

Came for this, left satisfied.

Sigh. As I said in the comments of that article, it’s not a Ponzi Scheme, it’s actually much more clever than that. See what you can find on SUM and then come back.

It appears to be so, yes. The campaign ends on a cliffhanger and a free DLC released after “The Last Jedi” will provide the ending, that probably ties into the events of the new movie. My suspicion is that it will explain how the First Order came about.

I think it’s harder with modern games. Expectations on lag and the like are different, and most “modern” games don’t use static pathfinding like the first Neverwinter did. That’s a big part of why Neverwinter 2 flopped so hard, in order to spruce up the game engine the needed walkmaps and they were prohibitively large…