Yeah, I don't agree with this either. I had some interest in GW2, it was not a lot of interest, but enough I'd have considered trying it. After hearing this, that they banned people for their own fuck-up, I don't really care to give these people my money. I mean, in the term of "exploit" by all means it's exploiting…

Except I hate to say, by teasing it on the iPad, I think this means it's gonna be on the iPad regardless. However it is true that they've been teasing Kingdom Hearts 3 in the 3DS KH games for years. Or at least the next spinoff title that isn't on that platform. So... maybe?

Considering all you get for the price, this isn't actually a bad deal at all if you want physical copies of everything. Of course you can easily obtain most of the PS1 Final Fantasy games on PSN or whatnot, and yes, that's cheaper, but physical-copy wise? This can't be beaten. That said, I'm good on FF games, I have…

I'd say part of it is that it seems with smartphones, the batteries really start to go to shit after about 2 years... at least is my experience so far (I've only owned one smartphone before my current. My old phone was an HTC Aria, admittedly though, that wasn't working so well even a year ago anyway... new one's a…

Is the game actually called "Atelier Totori: Alchemist of Arland 2"? Because Atelier Totori was subtitled "The Adventurer of Arland" and was the second game in the Arland series, but was a sequel to "Atelier Rorona: The Alchemist of Arland". Just trying to clarify here.

I've actually recently started playing the DQ series (I'm starting with IV on the DS, but have V, VI, VIII and IX as well, plus the two DQM: Joker games) and one thing I'm liking a lot already is the fact that it is a solo experience. I can see why making Dragon Quest an MMO would suck, in the same way I know it is…

Okay, so here's my take... I don't think the $20 price is too high. But it is for a title on iOS. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it's a great port (though not sure how the hell it will work, unless they automate everything that was previously on the top screen). Here's my problem with this: iOS devices (and as well…

I don't know. I don't even know where my comment is going to appear. But I'll tell you what, this is shit. :/

Actually, keep this shit out of my gaming. I honestly get enough calls at my house and see enough of this shit on TV as well as hear about it at work.

When compared to Sonic 3D Blast, I'm sure anything could be soothing. Because 3D Blast sucks. :P

3 used the newer Capcom logo screen, with the animation of a 3D model of it being put together or whatever... but yeah, Breath of Fire is always fun to play. Miss the days when Capcom still cared about that one, heh.

Eh, I had been hearing rumors of this for a while, so I am not overly surprised here. It doesn't make it any less crappy to hear, though, even though I haven't subscribed in years (admittedly stopped shortly after Future US took over, the magazine just didn't seem as good at that point...)

I'm going to assume it's similar to what they did with Star Ocean: The Last Hope for 360. Japan got anime portraits for the characters, the rest of the world got generic "headshots" of the 3D models. Although the game graphics were obviously the 3D models, the anime portraits are more expressive, and preferred.

From a business perspective, pretty much anything can be justified. :P From the customer stance, obviously it cannot be as easily justified. :P I'm not saying they would, but if Sony wanted to, they could, and wouldn't bat an eye at anything customers have to say about it unless the userbase dropped radically.

I think it was a good idea, too, but required too many things to be "perfect" to work right. And I hate to say the "new owners" will also find this to be the case.

Yeah, I'm not really saying that they should, and of course keeping in mind (though I don't think I said it above) that I don't play online anyway (I mostly play single player RPGs and the like) so I wouldn't need to pay regardless. Though if I did want to play something online, I do find it a huge pain that I need to…

Now, I don't really agree with that stance. It's a matter of "Not always playing online, why should I pay for time I'm not using?" I imagine. Which yeah, you pay monthly fees on your Internet and cell phone and whatnot, but you're also likely using those a few times a month. Sometimes work's got me so busy, I don't…

Personally, if Sony did start charging for basic online multiplayer... I don't think I'd mind too much if they kept it part of the existing Plus package, meaning they'd still give the discounts and freebies. PS+ is actually a fantastic service (I really need to get back on it, I had it for a short while as a demo…

Yeah, I agree with you here. I don't mind digital copies of anything so much, I use Steam a lot, I've honestly grown to be fine with PSN, XBL, and the eShop for games. Streaming works fine in the sense of something like... World of Warcraft, where the client loads up the basic assets initially needed, and downloads…

The problem with a Japanese XL, is that it wouldn't be able to play English Pokemon Black 2/White 2. Damn region locking on a handheld. :/