A legal (license/registration/emissions/enforcement) system that works better for the general public AND the enthusiast.
A legal (license/registration/emissions/enforcement) system that works better for the general public AND the enthusiast.
This laser headlight has that ICBM following feature.
I agree. You want feedback, drive a 914, no power steering.
I agree with you, autonomous vehicles are part of our future (when, I don't know), I just hope they're not forced upon us at any time.
Centripetal.
Uh oh, mommy left the internet on and seansssssss got online unsupervised.
My 4-5 year-old Garmin GPS has this feature.
Solar battery rechargers on every car. Easily integrates into the dashboard/roof/rear deck for hybrids, evs and gas vehicles.
Upcoming in that I believe more cars will start offering the feature... HUDs.
Reliable LEDs everywhere.
I don't know who you are, but thanks for serving as a warning to others.
I'll stick to a Stryker ICV.
Yo.
I never meant to suggest the 4th gen wasn't a nice car or a fast car. I only begrudge the flimsy chassis, updated or not.
Q. "... but who really had the money to drop 2.5-3 large on a rear end??"
GM could sell this car, at this price point, with a faster motor. I'm thinking LSA.
1. Having to qualify your statement, "for a RWD live-axle car", makes it irrelevant to what I stated. I didn't compare the 4th gen F-body to RWD live-axle cars, I'm comparing to other cars with torque-y engines.
I don't disagree that some of the 3rd gens were distasteful and certainly left people wanting more. But, like I said in another comment, the basic form of the chassis was the same from '82 to '92. Improvements were minor. I've disassembled both.
Small economical cars thrive in LA, but I like being "that guy" with "that car" (the Trans Am) at the stoplight. I understand if it's not for everyone.
Too high. Even fully loaded. Give it 4 years and GM will cancel production complaining of a lack of sales.