Typical. 

So... nothing to respond with beyond that?

I’ve been critical of sanders on this front before: when he is confronted with a question on how to deal with racial issues, he pivots into his stump speech.

Apparently you are. Anyone that likes Tulsi Gabbard willingly must be strange. But that’s okay. It takes a village. 

I honestly don’t remember why I brought it up. If I do, I’ll come back. I think it was something about he initial response to the one guy.

Familiarity is definitely the driving force at this point. I can’t imagine there are people in the electorate that focused on policy that have kept up with Biden’s positions on things that they know he’s the one already.

I admit it’s just a fear I have and it could be erroneous. There are so many candidates this time around that it won’t necessarily be a punching match between just two candidates, with one being the presumptive nominee from the beginning. 

The cycle hasn’t even started with him yet. I still remember in 2008 when he was struggling to gain traction and his record was definitely at the forefront. I would give it time.

Honestly, his record in this election cycle should undo him a lot faster. I just hope this doesn’t devolve into a 2016 thing. 

I think he forgot to put a sarcasm label on this. 

ITT

Before I respond to this, remind me, are you a sanders supporter? 

I think they’ve already attacked sanders on this in a previous article, much to to his sychophants chagrin. So attacking them on that is silly. However, what you most certainly can attack them on is their blatant hypocrisy on the notion of the “Resistance lol” articles they have producing since January 2017.

You’re right to an extent. I think the lesson I learned growing up under the W. administration is that you have to get all of the underlings too. If you don’t, they stew for awhile only to resurface later (see: Bolton.)

...chicken butt?

Also *you’re. Damn phone and clumsy fingers. 

By the by, Harris is probably my number 4 or 5 choice if anything. Not that it matters to you. 

I don’t really understand what you’re referring to exactly here, but that’s fine.

I should have said the 24 hour news cycle. 

You’re right. It seems at this point all of the candidates would succumb to that pressure unless proven otherwise.