Something tells me if he gets elected there's going to be hell toupèe.
SweetMelissa
SweetMelissa
You know whatever people can believe what they believe as long as we restrict their access to do anything out of line with my beliefs. It’s called freedumbs.
“He’s supported legislation in the past that would ban abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the mother’s life; at other points in time he’s supported bills seeking to ban abortions without exception.”
This is great.
Well, if you were fucking her husband while she was still married to him she's rightfully pissed at you. That said, she should move on and let you two have each other. :)
Divorce is pretty horrible and until you've been through I think it's difficult to imagine. If it's a short marriage, maybe a year or two, then it's less painful, I imagine (although I wouldn't bet on it). But if it's a long marriage, kids, entwined lives, families, etc.? That shit is HARD, no matter the state of the…
Be a little patient with her. She was abused and traumatized and probably lived her life by his rules, it's no wonder that she's had a hard time since the divorce. She's having to face the world on her own and figure out who she is.
Totally, which is why talking about how couples "stuck it out" 60 years ago is stupid!
She is not doing it for a national publication and you only read it because you went looking for it, so what is the problem? The problem I have with dirty-laundry shamers is, it usually is done to protect horrible people, such as abusers. For example, "Why are you writing about how your uncle molested you? Why are…
Narcissistic POS. Its her not me. This is not a man. He is a eunuch. Marriage is work, sometimes easy and sometimes a chore, but always work. She is another human being, not your shadow. She has feelings and foibles like everyone else. Self-pitying whiner with no compassion and very little love. Your partner is the…
I don't know if this helps, but...
Man, SHE’S gross. I think he is an abuse victim, same as a female child would be considered in this case if the role’s were reversed. He’s an adult now but honestly his life has been so intertwined with hers as she basically stole his childhood and saddled him with kids super early. As a result, this woman has always…
please don’t bring my third fave vegetable cauliflower into this :-(
According to his article, he actually got MARRIED in 2012. And is already divorced. And Mark posted another link, that he cheated on the wife, so obviously he knows everything about all marriages.
This is why I’m a dog person.
That’s my big takeaway. RS was a trusted journalistic institution, and the reason this thing was so big is because we all assume that RS is doing the hard work of journalism to back it up. And they didn’t. For me, it’s not an issue of whether or not to trust any future reporting about rape - it’s an issue of whether…
No one other than Rolling Stone, the reporter, the editor, and ‘Jackie’ can be sued. All the websites that discussed the case were discussing it based on RS’s reporting and thus could only use the misleading information RS provided. The fuck up was RS’s not anyone else’s. Neither this site nor any other can be held…
Actually, the 60 Minutes Bush National Guard story was true, it’s just that the memo they used as evidence in the story wasn’t properly vetted and is (probably) a forgery.