Yes keep ignoring the points people make. You sure know how to hold intelligent conversation.

Leggings aren't tight pants. They show exactly what you look like naked, but not even that because they are tight, it's like wearing spanx in public. I can see your vulva. Aaaand your ass. Do you want 13 year old girls running around with visible asses and vulvas? It's not about what the boys do, it just seems like…

"Superior," because your comment was condescending... You are entitled to your own views... I actually think you are correct, but it is just RUDE to say it... As you seem to understand, everybody is entitled to their own believes - Some people juste have more sense than you do...

you're a loser

Then you're looking for a policy that should read "underwear should not be visible". Butts hang out if you neatly tuck your shirt in to your uniform pants because that is the nature of butts.

It's not just that they're tight, it's that a lot of leggings are made out of cheap material and you can see right through them. And give me a break with the "shaming the children" crap. Children need to learn that they can't always do whatever they want. Nobody's butt needs to be hanging out, although I'm sure…

I'm with Mike_TO: making something harder is the point, not making it impossible (which is impossible). The 3D printed gun is a lightning rod, clearly, but the actual argument is about whether it is a good idea to try to regulate open source design or not. My point of view, if it's not already clear, is that open…

Yes, this. The rule should not be no leggings because boys will think you look sexy. The rule should just be no leggings because leggings as pants are not appropriate at school. Lots of things that you might wear to the gym are not appropriate at school or anywhere else besides the gym and your house.

In other words, we have no definitive information on much of anything.

a point of view which is in no way related to the actual article. Nobody cares about your "superior" beliefs.

Jeans do not compare to Leggings. They actually have some thickness to them. Unlike leggings.

Only curious, do you think some line should be drawn in with dress codes?

But kids shouldn't be able to wear whatever they want to school, are adults allowed to wear whatever they want to work, of course not. I wasn't shaming kids, school isn't about clothes its about getting your education, and that's it. Do some see this as sexist probably do, but I'm pretty sure boys are not allowed to…

Maybe they think the leggings will sexualize them. You know how paranoid schools are.

If anyone could download and print a WMD — say a global-level WMD — should it be regulated? The obvious answer is yes.

Wale certainly picked the ideal event at which to start a nonexistent fight.

What is so frustrating about this is when Suey Park takes on someone like Colbert it diminishes her credibility and the very real racism that is out there. You can't yell racism at something as innocent as this was and not lose your power when someone really does say something appalling. She took her cause back many…

Yeah I watched the HuffPo interview, and I didn't really like how they chopped Suey off as she was trying to make a point.

Or if it was based on actual racism.

I don't know why but it really bothers me that *some* isn't before men. I met my husband online and he is one of the few unicorns that didn't offer me dick pics, ask me intrusive questions or flat out message me with invites for a quick fuck so yah I know how it feels like every fucking person out there is a creepy…